Time-Energy Uncertainty Principle: Info & Derivation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rajini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the time-energy uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the different formulations of the principle and the existence of a derivation. Participants explore the implications of various constants in the uncertainty relation and the validity of the principle itself.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the uncertainty relation is often stated as \(\Delta E \Delta t \geq \hbar/2\), while others mention that some texts use \(\Delta E \Delta t \geq \hbar\), questioning the reasons for this discrepancy.
  • One participant argues that the factor of 1/2 is the minimum for a Gaussian distribution, suggesting that not all cases conform to this distribution.
  • Several participants assert that there is no time-energy uncertainty relation in the form commonly presented, referencing external sources to support this claim.
  • Another participant explains the time dependence of energy eigenstates and how it relates to the uncertainty principle through Fourier transforms, indicating that the relationship can yield \(\Delta E \Delta t \sim h\) under certain conditions.
  • There is a reiteration that while the natural width of a spectral line is related to the lifetime of the state, the general applicability of the uncertainty relation remains contested.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the existence and formulation of the time-energy uncertainty principle, with multiple competing views presented. Some participants support the existence of a relation, while others argue against it, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the definitions and assumptions regarding the uncertainty relation, as well as the dependence on the context of energy eigenstates and their time dependence. The discussion highlights the complexity and nuances involved in interpreting the principle.

Rajini
Messages
619
Reaction score
4
Dear PF members,
I want to know some accurate informations regarding the time-energy uncertainty principle.
From several websites i got that [tex]\Delta[/tex]E[tex]\Delta[/tex]t[tex]\geq[/tex][tex]\hbar[/tex]/2 (for e.g., hyperphysics, wiki, etc.).
But in some books they use [tex]\Delta[/tex]E[tex]\Delta[/tex]t[tex]\geq[/tex][tex]\hbar[/tex].
Can anyone clear this why it is like that...Also is there any small derivation for that?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The uncertainty is of order hbar. The 1/2 is the absolute minimum for a Gaussian distribution in time and energy, which is not usually the case for energy and time.
Some books just don't bother with factors like 1/'2 when giving order of magnitude lower limits.
 
And here:

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v122/i5/p1649_1
 
In quantum mechanics, energy eigenstates have a time dependence of the form [tex]\exp(i\omega t)[/tex]. Since all solutions to the dynamical equation (Schrödinger equation) are superpositions of energy eigenstates (on spacetime), the time dependence of an amplitude will be generally of the form

[tex]A(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \tilde{A}(\omega) e^{i\omega t} d\omega[/tex]

where [tex]\tilde{A}[/tex] is the Fourier transform of A(t). If A(t) is mostly finite only in a region of size Δt, then by familiar properties of the Fourier transform, [tex]\tilde{A}(\omega)[/tex] will be finite in region of size Δω ~ 1/Δt, or (using [tex]E = \hbar \omega[/tex])

ΔE Δt ~ h

The precise constant of proportionality depends on the definition of 'Δ', i.e. what we mean by "mostly finite only in a region of size Δt".
 
Count Iblis said:
There is no time energy uncertainty relation like that at all! See e.g. here:

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0609163

Pages 6, 7 and 8.
Regardless of formalism, the natural width of a spectral line is related to the lifetime of the state by [tex]\Delta E\Delta t\sim\hbar[/tex].
 
Hi Dx,
thanks for your reply..Now i understand..abour delta.
Clem..the link that you send are good..But one should write properly and precisely ...since hbar is very small..
Thanks
 
clem said:
Regardless of formalism, the natural width of a spectral line is related to the lifetime of the state by [tex]\Delta E\Delta t\sim\hbar[/tex].

Yes, I agree. The problem is that this is not a universal result. In general, there is no energy time uncertainty relation of this simple form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K