Time evolution of a two-state system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the time evolution of a two-state system, specifically focusing on an Electron Neutrino and its state representation at later times. The context includes the need to express the initial state in terms of energy eigenstates due to the non-eigenstate nature of the given states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to express the initial state U1 in terms of mass eigenstates and question the relevance of neutrino oscillations to the problem. There is uncertainty about how to expand the state given the lack of coverage on mass eigenstates in their studies.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on expressing the initial state in terms of mass eigenstates, while others express uncertainty about their familiarity with this concept. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts to clarify the problem and explore the necessary mathematical framework.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may be intended to focus on general two-state systems rather than the specifics of neutrino oscillations, highlighting a potential gap in their coursework regarding mass eigenstates.

Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


Hey guys,
I have a question that asks;
Assume an Electron Nuetrino (U1) is produced at t = 0. Find the state U(t) for later times t > 0.

To give some context the question is based on a two state system where U1 = Collumn vector (sin(theta) cos(theta)) and U2 = Collumn vector (-sin(theta) cos(theta)).

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I get that its asking me to essentially write the system with the time dependance, and I can't simply bolt the time dependence exponential on the end because U1/U2 are not generally eigenstates of the hamiltonian. So I need to expand U(t=0) in terms of energy eigenstates and then I can include the time dependent exponential for t>0.
Im just not sure how to do this, since I know its in the state U1 at t=0 what's to expand? any advice would be appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A good start would be to express U1 in the mass eigenstates.
 
Hmmm, we havn't covered that, we havn't looked in any detail at the specific case of nuetrino oscillations. I think he was just hoping to make us think about simple two state systems rather than nuetrino oscillations themselves.
 
Well, there is nothing specifically peculiar for the case of neutrino oscillations. The same procedure will be applicable to any two level system.

Are you saying you have not seen how to write an arbitrary vector as a linear combination of a set of basis vectors?
 
No sorry, it was the mass eitrnstates I haven't seen before.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K