Xenosum
- 18
- 2
Homework Statement
Consider the Lagrangian, L, given by
[tex]L = \partial_{\mu}\phi^{*}(x)\partial^{\mu}\phi(x) - m^2\phi^{*}(x)\phi(x) .[/tex]
The conjugate momenta to [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\phi^{*}(x)[/itex] are denoted, respectively, by [itex]\pi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\pi^{*}(x)[/itex]. Thus,
[tex]\pi(x) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{0}\phi(x))} = \partial_0\phi^{*}(x)[/tex]
[tex]\pi^{*}(x) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{0}\phi^{*}(x))} = \partial_0\phi(x) .[/tex]
Upon quantizing the system, [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\phi^{*}(x)[/itex] are promoted to operators which satisfy the equal-time commutation relations:
[tex][ \phi(x) , \pi(y) ] = i\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x} - \vec{y})[/tex]
[tex][ \phi^{*}(x) , \pi^{*}(y) ] = i\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x} - \vec{y})[/tex]
(all others zero). In the Heisenberg regime, the time evolution of the operator [itex]\phi(x)[/itex], [itex]i \partial_0 \phi(x)[/itex], is given by
[tex]i \partial_0 \phi(x) = \left[ \phi(x) , H(y) \right].[/tex]
The Hamiltonian may be derived from the Lagrangian, and we find that
[tex]i\frac{\partial \phi(x)}{\partial t} = \int d^{3}y \left( \left[ \phi(x) , \pi(y)\pi^{*}(y) \right] + \left[ \phi(x) , \nabla\phi^{*}(y) \cdot \nabla\phi(y) \right] + m^2 \left[ \phi(x) , \phi^{*}(y)\phi(y) \right] \right).[/tex]
Now here's my question. When we evaluate the commutators both my professor and a solution manual to Peskin and Schroeder claim that only the first commutator survives, because [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] commutes with everything except for the its conjugate momentum (by the canonical commutation relations). I don't see why. The canonical commutation relations only give us a relationship between [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\pi(y)[/itex], not e.g. [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\phi(y)[/itex]. The point is pressed by the fact that one can only show that the commutator [itex]\left[ \phi(x) , \phi(y) \right][/itex] vanishes for space-like separation between the points x and y (this is the condition which preserves causality).
I guess it would be resolved if the commutator were instead [itex]\left[ \phi(x) , H(x) \right][/itex], but this doesn't seem to be how it's done.
Thanks for any help!