Time Evolution of the Complex Scalar Field

Xenosum
Messages
18
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Consider the Lagrangian, L, given by

[tex]L = \partial_{\mu}\phi^{*}(x)\partial^{\mu}\phi(x) - m^2\phi^{*}(x)\phi(x) .[/tex]

The conjugate momenta to [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\phi^{*}(x)[/itex] are denoted, respectively, by [itex]\pi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\pi^{*}(x)[/itex]. Thus,

[tex]\pi(x) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{0}\phi(x))} = \partial_0\phi^{*}(x)[/tex]
[tex]\pi^{*}(x) = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_{0}\phi^{*}(x))} = \partial_0\phi(x) .[/tex]

Upon quantizing the system, [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\phi^{*}(x)[/itex] are promoted to operators which satisfy the equal-time commutation relations:

[tex][ \phi(x) , \pi(y) ] = i\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x} - \vec{y})[/tex]
[tex][ \phi^{*}(x) , \pi^{*}(y) ] = i\delta^{(3)}(\vec{x} - \vec{y})[/tex]

(all others zero). In the Heisenberg regime, the time evolution of the operator [itex]\phi(x)[/itex], [itex]i \partial_0 \phi(x)[/itex], is given by

[tex]i \partial_0 \phi(x) = \left[ \phi(x) , H(y) \right].[/tex]

The Hamiltonian may be derived from the Lagrangian, and we find that

[tex]i\frac{\partial \phi(x)}{\partial t} = \int d^{3}y \left( \left[ \phi(x) , \pi(y)\pi^{*}(y) \right] + \left[ \phi(x) , \nabla\phi^{*}(y) \cdot \nabla\phi(y) \right] + m^2 \left[ \phi(x) , \phi^{*}(y)\phi(y) \right] \right).[/tex]

Now here's my question. When we evaluate the commutators both my professor and a solution manual to Peskin and Schroeder claim that only the first commutator survives, because [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] commutes with everything except for the its conjugate momentum (by the canonical commutation relations). I don't see why. The canonical commutation relations only give us a relationship between [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\pi(y)[/itex], not e.g. [itex]\phi(x)[/itex] and [itex]\phi(y)[/itex]. The point is pressed by the fact that one can only show that the commutator [itex]\left[ \phi(x) , \phi(y) \right][/itex] vanishes for space-like separation between the points x and y (this is the condition which preserves causality).

I guess it would be resolved if the commutator were instead [itex]\left[ \phi(x) , H(x) \right][/itex], but this doesn't seem to be how it's done.

Thanks for any help!

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Xenosum said:
In the Heisenberg regime, the time evolution of the operator ϕ(x) \phi(x) , i∂0ϕ(x) i \partial_0 \phi(x) , is given by

i∂0ϕ(x)=[ϕ(x),H(y)].​

The Hamiltonian really should be the Hamiltonian at time ##x^0 = y^0## (note that you are integrating over the spatial components of ##y##). As a result, ##x## and ##y## have space-like separation and the commutator ##[\phi(x),\phi(y)]## vanishes (they are even equal-time).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Xenosum
Cool, thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K