Time in Physics 4-Vectors: Is Time Included in the Position Four-Vector?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the role of time within the context of 4-vectors in physics, particularly whether time can be considered a component of the momentum 4-vector or if there exists a distinct physics 4-vector that incorporates time. The conversation explores theoretical implications and definitions related to 4-vectors in both mathematical and physical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant quotes a previous thread suggesting that "Energy is the time component of the momentum 4-vector," prompting questions about the relationship between time and energy within 4-vectors.
  • Another participant clarifies that the term "time component" refers to the first component of the coordinate 4-vector, which is ct, and not a direct substitution of time for energy.
  • A different participant explains the four-momentum and its derivation from the position four-vector, emphasizing that time cannot be substituted for energy due to dimensional inconsistencies.
  • There is a mention of the colloquial use of 'time component' in relation to the metric of 4-vectors, indicating that ct serves as the 'time component' but does not imply a direct equivalence with time itself.
  • One participant inquires about the existence of a physics 4-vector that includes time, indicating a desire for clarification on this aspect.
  • Another participant asserts that the position four-vector does indeed include time as its 'timelike component', specifically in the form (ct, x, y, z).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether time can be equated with energy in the context of 4-vectors. While some clarify the definitions and relationships, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of a distinct physics 4-vector that includes time.

Contextual Notes

There is ambiguity in the terminology used, particularly regarding the distinction between mathematical and physical interpretations of 4-vectors. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity on the definitions and roles of components within these vectors.

jaketodd
Gold Member
Messages
507
Reaction score
21
A quote from an old thread reads "Energy is the time component of the momentum 4-vector"

That quote came from a Science Advisor.

Does this mean that time can be either a) substituted for energy in the momentum 4-vector, or b) seen as equivalent to energy in the momentum 4-vector? Hmm, maybe my a) and b) are the same. Regardless, the question remains. If the answer is "No," then is there a physics 4-vector that includes time? I say "physics" as to discern them from purely mathematical 4-vectors.

Also, when working with physics 4-vectors of the same sort, such as comparing physics 4-vectors of the same sort, do all the constituent vectors combine of a given physics 4-vector? If so, what are the operators of how they combine?

Thanks,

Jake
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, neither, and I think I see where the confusion comes from. "the time component" is, what I believe, a reference to the coordinate 4-vector [itex]x_{\alpha}=\langle ct,x,y,z \rangle[/itex] where the first component is a time coordinate. Then identifying the first component of each 4-vector as the "time component" simply references the scalar part of the 4-vector.

There are however some amazing connections between time and energy, outside of, perhaps, simple phrasing. One of which is that the energy of a system is identified as the source for temporal-translation.

I hope this helps.
 
Neither.

The four-momentum is [itex]\vec{p} =(\gamma mc,\gamma m\boldsymbol{v})=(\frac{E}{c},\boldsymbol{p})[/itex]. It comes from taking the derivative of the position four-vector with respect to proper time and multiplying by the invariant mass. The temporal component is the energy divided by c. The spatial component is the relativistic three-momentum. That doesn't mean time can be substituted for energy (it doesn't make sense, even dimensionally) or vice versa.
 
The colloquial use of the phrase 'time component' just means the 0 component of a 4-vector in a 0,1,2,3 metric. The only connection with real time is that ct is the 'time component' of the vector x^\mu.
 
So there is no physics 4-vector that includes time?

Thanks,

Jake
 
I wrote that the space-time 4-vector x^\mu=(ct;x,y,z) includes time as its 'timelike component'.
 
jaketodd said:
So there is no physics 4-vector that includes time?

Thanks,

Jake

The position four-vector does. The components are (ct,x,y,z).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K