Time-independent perturbation theory

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In each of my QM books, they always say something like "we can write the perturbed energies and wavefunctions as"

[tex]E_n = E_n^{(0)} + \lambda E_n^{(1)} + \lambda^2 E_n^{(2)} + \cdots[/tex]

[tex]|n\rangle = |n^{(0)}\rangle + \lambda |n^{(1)}\rangle + \lambda^2 |n^{(2)}\rangle + \cdots[/tex]

without any justification. This is really not obvious to me and although it seems reasonable, it do not see why the perturbed energies and wavefunctions might not be something completely different like

[tex]E_n = E_n^{(0)} + \lambda E_n^{(1)} + \lambda^2 \log \left(E_n^{(2)}\right)^{-1}\sin E_n^{(2)} + \cdots[/tex]

[tex]|n\rangle = |n^{(0)}\rangle + \lambda |n^{(1)}\rangle + \lambda^2 |n^{(2)}\rangle + \cdots[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Expanding the energies and wave functions as a function of the perturbation parameter is an iterative manner which is well behaved. The function you wrote for the energy has poles and in multivalued.
 
ehrenfest said:

Homework Statement


In each of my QM books, they always say something like "we can write the perturbed energies and wavefunctions as"

[tex]E_n = E_n^{(0)} + \lambda E_n^{(1)} + \lambda^2 E_n^{(2)} + \cdots[/tex]

[tex]|n\rangle = |n^{(0)}\rangle + \lambda |n^{(1)}\rangle + \lambda^2 |n^{(2)}\rangle + \cdots[/tex]

without any justification. This is really not obvious to me and although it seems reasonable, it do not see why the perturbed energies and wavefunctions might not be something completely different like

[tex]E_n = E_n^{(0)} + \lambda E_n^{(1)} + \lambda^2 \log \left(E_n^{(2)}\right)^{-1}\sin E_n^{(2)} + \cdots[/tex]

[tex]|n\rangle = |n^{(0)}\rangle + \lambda |n^{(1)}\rangle + \lambda^2 |n^{(2)}\rangle + \cdots[/tex]

Homework Equations


You are right that it's an assumption that is being made. The assumption is that the perturbation Hamiltonian is a small perturbation, which means that as lambda goes to zero, the energies and wavefunctions smoothly approach the unperturbed results. This assumption does fail in some cases (for example, trying to treat the Couloumb potential in Hydrogen as a perturbation would fail completely because the energy expansion would diverge in lambda which would signal the fact that the Coulomb potential has to be included to all orders so it cannot really be treated as a perturbation)