Time measured by free-fall observer near object?

  • Thread starter johne1618
  • Start date
  • #1
370
0
What is the time measured by an observer who is in free-fall near an object?

The Schwarzchild metric is given by:

[itex] \large c^2 d\tau^2 = (1 - \frac{r_s}{r}) c^2 dt^2 - ( 1 - \frac{r_s}{r})^{-1} dr^2 - r^2(d\theta^2 + \sin^2 \theta d\phi^2) [/itex]

Now for an observer at a fixed position one uses:

[itex]dr = d\theta = d\phi = 0[/itex]

To give an element of proper time as:

[itex] \large d\tau = \sqrt{1 - \frac{r_s}{r}} dt [/itex]

This is a time interval experienced by an observer who is stationary in the object's gravitational field.

But I want the time measured by a free-fall observer so I can't assume that his position is fixed.

Perhaps this is how to do the calculation.

I work out the world line for a radial light beam using:

[itex] d\tau = d\theta = d\phi = 0 [/itex]

Substituting into the above Schwarzchild metric I find the worldline of a lightbeam given by

[itex] \large (1 - \frac{r_s}{r}) \ c \ dt = dr [/itex]

Now a free-fall observer experiences a flat spacetime locally. He must use a time element [itex]d\tau[/itex] such that a light beam's worldline is diagonal so that

[itex] \large c \ d\tau = dr [/itex]

Therefore his time element must be:

[itex] \large d\tau = (1 - \frac{r_s}{r}) \ dt [/itex]

Does this make sense?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
5,428
291
The four velocity of the LeMaitre free-faller is
[tex]
U=\left(\frac{r}{r-2\,m}, -\frac{\sqrt{2}\,\sqrt{m}}{\sqrt{r}} , 0 , 0\right)
[/tex]
which agrees with your result.
 
  • #3
370
0
The four velocity of the LeMaitre free-faller is
[tex]
U=\left(\frac{r}{r-2\,m}, -\frac{\sqrt{2}\,\sqrt{m}}{\sqrt{r}} , 0 , 0\right)
[/tex]
which agrees with your result.
Great - thanks!

I'm also interested in calculating the correct time interval we should use with the Friedmann Walker metric

[itex] \large ds^2 = -dt^2 + a^2(t) [ \frac{dr^2}{1-kr^2} + r^2(d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta d\phi^2)] [/itex]

As co-moving observers we are also in free-fall.

Thus using [itex]ds = d\theta = d\phi = 0[/itex]

The worldline of a radial light beam is given by

[itex] \large \frac{dt}{a(t)} = \frac{dr}{1-kr^2} [/itex]

Thus the interval of proper time [itex]d\tau[/itex] for a co-moving observer with a locally flat spacetime (assuming k is small) is given by

[itex] \large d\tau = \frac{dt}{a(t)} [/itex]

which I believe is called an interval of conformal time.

I think many people believe we should use cosmological time [itex]t[/itex] as our proper time but according to the above reasoning that is not correct because we are in free-fall (in a local inertial frame) and therefore our proper time is conformal time.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
5,428
291
I don't think that's right. If you divide the line interval by dτ2 and set the spatial velocities to zero you get dt/dτ = 1 for this co-moving frame.
 
  • #5
370
0
I don't think that's right. If you divide the line interval by dτ2 and set the spatial velocities to zero you get dt/dτ = 1 for this co-moving frame.
Could you elaborate a little more?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
5,428
291
I can't eleborate without doing the simple algebra and tex'ing it up which I don't have time for. Get a pencil, paper and eraser and do as I suggested. If you have a problem then you could ask about specifics. Remember that ds=dτ.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
370
0
Ok - this is what I think you did.

For simplicity starting with the FRW metric with k=0 and only radial spatial component:

[itex] \large d\tau^2 = dt^2 - a(t)^2 dr^2 [/itex]

divide through by [itex]d\tau^2[/itex]

[itex] \large 1 = \frac{dt^2}{d\tau^2} - a(t)^2 \frac{dr^2}{d\tau^2} [/itex]

For a co-moving frame spatial velocity is zero so

[itex] \large \frac{dr}{d\tau} = 0 [/itex]

Therefore

[itex] \large \frac{dt}{d\tau} = 1 [/itex]

Is this right?
 
  • #8
5,428
291
Your calculation is correct.
 

Related Threads on Time measured by free-fall observer near object?

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
881
Replies
2
Views
330
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
504
Top