Time-reversal operator for fermions (Sakurai)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the time-reversal operator, \Theta, for spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ fermions as presented in J.J. Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" (2nd ed., pg. 277, eq. (4.4.65)). The operator is expressed as \Theta = \eta e^{\frac{-i \pi S_{y}}{\hbar}}K = -i \eta \left( \frac{2S_{y}}{\hbar} \right) K, where \eta is a complex number, S_{y} is the y-component of the spin operator, and K denotes complex conjugation. The key point of confusion is the transition to the last equality, which is validated by working in a basis where S_y/\hbar is diagonal with eigenvalues of ±1/2, confirming its validity as a matrix equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly spin operators.
  • Familiarity with the concept of time-reversal symmetry in quantum systems.
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and their manipulation in quantum mechanics.
  • Ability to work with matrix representations of quantum operators.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the time-reversal operator in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the implications of time-reversal symmetry on quantum states.
  • Learn about the properties of spin operators and their matrix representations.
  • Investigate the role of complex conjugation in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, theoretical physicists, and researchers focusing on quantum symmetries and spin systems will benefit from this discussion.

Sdakouls
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In Modern Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.) by J.J. Sakurai, in section 4.4 on 'The Time-Reversal Discrete Symmetry' he derives the time-reversal operator, [tex]\Theta[/tex], for the spin-[tex]$\frac{1}{2}$[/tex] case as (pg.: 277, eq. (4.4.65)):

[tex]\Theta = \eta e^{\frac{-i \pi S_{y}}{\hbar}}K = -i \eta \left( \frac{2S_{y}}{\hbar} \right) K[/tex]

where [tex]\eta[/tex] is some arbitrary unit magnitude complex number, [tex]S_{y}[/tex] is the y-component of the spin operator and [tex]K[/tex] is the complex conjugation operator.

Now, I can follow everything he does, except this last equality. I don't know how/why he is able to write down this last equality (I know it's not some kind of Taylor expansion because of the absence of [tex]\pi[/tex] on the RHS). If anyone could shed any light on this, it'd be most appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work in a basis where [itex]S_y/\hbar[/itex] is diagonal with eigenvalues [itex]\pm1/2[/itex]. You can check that the last equality is valid for each eigenvalue; therefore it is valid as a matrix equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K