Time reversibility of velocity verlet easy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the time reversibility of the velocity Verlet scheme in the context of classical mechanics. Participants are examining the mathematical formulation of the scheme and its implications for motion over time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to manipulate the equations of motion by substituting negative time increments to explore time reversibility. Questions arise regarding the role of the squared factor of time in the acceleration term and its implications for the proof.

Discussion Status

Some participants are actively working through the calculations and expressing confusion about certain aspects, particularly regarding the simplification of terms. Others are suggesting specific calculations to clarify the relationships between position and velocity at different time increments. There is no explicit consensus yet, but productive directions are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the velocity Verlet equations and questioning the assumptions underlying the time reversibility concept. The discussion reflects a mix of personal interpretations and mathematical reasoning without definitive conclusions.

dikmikkel
Messages
160
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that the velocity verlet scheme is time reversible.

Homework Equations


r(t+dt) = r(t) + v(t)dt + 1/2a dt^2
v(t+dt) = v(t) + 1/2 a(t)dt + 1/2a(t+dt)dt

The Attempt at a Solution


I substitute -dt in at dt and get:
r(t-dt) = r(t) - v(t)dt +1/2a dt^2
v(t-dt) = v(t) -1/2a(t)dt -1/2a(t-dt)dt

the squared factor of time in the acceleration term is annoying me, can it be done easier?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what exactly do you see is wrong with the squared factor?
 
Well, the acceleration should(my opinion) lead to move the position back again if it is time reversible(as it is). Can you help?
 
do the calculations for t''=t'+dt, then do them again for t'=t-dt, everything should simplify back to t''=t.
 
Last edited:
When i do that it still does not make sense to me.
Would you do the first half part, maybe with substitutions.
 
Okay, now i found out i think.

r(t+dt) = r(t)+v(t)dt + 1/2a(t)dt^2
v(t+dt) = v(t)+1/2a(t)dt + 1/2a(t+dt)dt
Now we are at r(t+dt) and want to reverse it:
r(t-dt) = r(t+dt) - v(t+dt)dt + 1/2a(t+dt)dt^2 =
r(t)+v(t)dt + 1/2a(t)dt^2 -(v(t)+1/2a(t)dt + 1/2a(t+dt)dt)dt +1/2a(t+dt)dt^2 =
r(t) . Q.e.d
v(t-dt) = v(t+dt) - 1/2a(t+dt)dt-1/2a(t+dt-dt)dt =
v(t)+1/2a(t)dt + 1/2a(t+dt)dt -1/2a(t+dt)dt-1/2a(t)dt =
v(t), q.e.d
Is that right?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K