- #1

- 9

- 0

Thanks!

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter I_wonder
- Start date

- #1

- 9

- 0

Thanks!

- #2

f95toli

Science Advisor

Gold Member

- 3,131

- 616

It is not that simple, mainly because the only thing we can calculate is the *probability* to find the electron in a given state. If you drive a two level system (e.g. an atom where the energy of the photons are chosen so that only one transition is active) using e.g. a laser what you find is that this probability changes a rate proportional to the amplitude of the drive field and the dipole moment of the transition(meaning yes, it does depend on the levels); this rate is just the inverse of the Rabi frequency.

see e.g.

http://physics.schooltool.nl/quantumoptics/rabi_jaynesmodel.php [Broken]

Note that the main difference between the "semi-classical" Rabi model and the QED version (using a J-C Hamiltonian) is just the presence of the vacuum Rabi oscillations in the latter; i.e. the semi-classical model with a classical drive field is actually quite good.

I know that this is not what you asked for, but the point is that Rabi rate is the only time-scale we can actually talk about or indeed observe in experiments.

see e.g.

http://physics.schooltool.nl/quantumoptics/rabi_jaynesmodel.php [Broken]

Note that the main difference between the "semi-classical" Rabi model and the QED version (using a J-C Hamiltonian) is just the presence of the vacuum Rabi oscillations in the latter; i.e. the semi-classical model with a classical drive field is actually quite good.

I know that this is not what you asked for, but the point is that Rabi rate is the only time-scale we can actually talk about or indeed observe in experiments.

Last edited by a moderator:

Share:

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 420

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 402