Time to cover a ground distance.

  • Thread starter Thread starter acegsm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground Time
AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it will take the Canadian goose to cover a ground distance of 600 km while flying at an adjusted angle of 17.5 degrees to the west of south, the bird's effective speed relative to the ground must first be calculated. Given the wind speed of 30 km/h from west to east, the bird's southward speed needs to be adjusted accordingly. The bird's speed relative to the ground can be found using vector addition, resulting in a speed of approximately 94.87 km/h southward. Finally, to find the time taken to cover 600 km, the formula time = distance/speed can be applied, yielding a travel time of about 6.32 hours. This calculation confirms the bird's ability to navigate effectively despite wind conditions.
acegsm
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Canadian geese migrate essentially along a north-south direction for well over a thousand kilometers in some cases, traveling at speeds up to about 100 km/h . If one such bird is flying at 100 km/h relative to the air, but there is a 30.0km/h wind blowing from west to east. At what angle relative to the north-south direction should this bird head so that it will be traveling directly southward relative to the ground?

I calculated this part, and was correct -- 17.5 degrees to the west of south. My question is part b:

How long will it take the bird to cover a ground distance of 600 km from north to south? (Note: Even on cloudy nights, many birds can navigate using the Earth's magnetic field to fix the north-south direction.) In Hours!



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

I was able to calculate part A, however I do not know where to go with part B. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I should add -- I did the inverse tangent(30/100) in order to figure out the 17.
 
Calculate the bird's speed with respect to the ground.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top