To get rid of a singularity in the Lagrange equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,200
Reaction score
1,020
A disk of radius ##r## is wrapped with an inextensible massless string. A particle of mass ##m## is attached to the end of the string. The disk rotates about its center ##O## with angular velocity ##\Omega=const##. The whole system is placed on a smooth horizontal table.
This is a Lagrangian system with one degree of freedom. To study this system take ##x,\quad x>0## the length of the free tail of the string as a generalized coordinate.
It is easy to calculate the Lagrangian
$$L=\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{r^2}x^2\dot x^2+\frac{1}{2}m\Omega^2x^2.$$
The Lagrange equation has a singularity at ##x=0## . To get rid of this problem introduce a new variable ##\xi=x^2.## The Lagrangian takes the form
$$L=\frac{1}{8}\frac{m}{r^2}\dot \xi^2+\frac{1}{2}m\Omega^2\xi.$$
To understand the dynamics it is convenient to draw a phase portrait that is to draw a set of level lines of the generalized energy integral $$H=\frac{1}{8}\frac{m}{r^2}\dot \xi^2-\frac{1}{2}m\Omega^2\xi$$ in the plane ##(\xi,\dot \xi)##.
It is interesting to note that the system has solutions that first wind up on the coil and then wind off the coil; the particle does not touch the coil.
Also there are solutions ##x(t)## such that ##\dot x\to-\infty## as ##x\to 0##.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251120_184643.webp
    Screenshot_20251120_184643.webp
    10.6 KB · Views: 3
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the wire wrapping direction wrt ##\Omega## matter in your result ? It seems that one tighten and the other loosen the wire.
 
For intuition it is convenient to consider the wrapping direction as it is shown at the picture and to assume that the string remains tighten. I have written formulas in such an assumption. Anyway all these words just describe an ideal constraint we use.
 
I see.
1763766898822.webp


Tension from the wire (blue) generates centripetal force (green) for circulation of m. The rest component (purple) causes unwrapping the wire. Thus x increases with time.

Am I correct ?
 
Last edited:
Thanks. 
For x/r ##\rightarrow \infty##, the purple force decreases so ##\dot{x}## would also decrease.
For x=0 wire tension cannot generate centripetal force. The singularity would come from it.
For x=+0 wire tension is +##\infty## thus the purple force is also +##\infty## which would cause infinite ##\dot{x}##.
 
Actually we do not know how the centripetal force is directed. To understand that one must know the trajectory first.
 
Last edited:
I try to make the Lagrangian. Say coordinate of m is (X,Y)
$$X=r \sec \phi \ \cos (\theta - \phi) $$
$$Y=r \sec \phi \ \ sin (\theta - \phi) $$
where
$$\theta = \Omega t + \frac{x}{r} + \theta_0-\frac{x_0}{r} $$
$$\phi = \tan^{-1}\frac{x}{r}$$
Lagrangian is made of kinetic energy caluculated by these, i.e.
$$\frac{2}{m}L=A\dot{x}^2 + B\dot{x}+C$$
where
$$A=\sin^2\phi+\sec^2\phi=1+\frac{x^2}{r^2}+\frac{x^2}{r^2+x^2}$$
$$B=2r\Omega \sec^2\phi = 2r\Omega (1+\frac{x^2}{r^2}) $$
$$C=r^2\Omega^2 \sec^2\phi=r^2\Omega^2(1+\frac{x^2}{r^2})$$
Lagrange equation is
$$ 2A\ddot{x}+A'\dot{x}^2-C'=0$$
where prime means derivative by x.
$$ A'=2x [\frac{1}{r^2}+\frac{r^2}{(r^2+x^2)^2}]$$
$$ C'=2\Omega^2 x$$

This seems more complicated than that of OP.

In this equation x=0 is not singular point but it might be a stationary solution.

2025-11-22 16.20.25.webp


In a simple case of no wire, mass m is detatched from the disk at a moment and do intertial motion later. It also stands if the wire is attached. The wire extends as ##x=r\Omega t ## and no tension in it. The time reversal of it also stands: m is approaching the disk. No tension in the winded wire. Here no show of potential energy.

T=0 means wire does nothing. m will do free inertial motion. ##T\neq 0## means that the wire would decrease ##\Omega## at the other end. Energy will be provided from outside of the system to maintain ##\Omega## so energy of mass should increase. If there is no potential, its kinetic energy should increase. I am not good at dealing with Lagrangian in such conditions.
 
Last edited:
No given (active) forces, no potential energy, just ideal constraints.

Introduce a frame ##Oxyz##. The axis ##Oy## passes through the point ##O## and the point where the string comes off the disk. The frame ##Oxyz## rotates and has the angular velocity
$$\boldsymbol \omega=(\Omega+\dot x/r)\boldsymbol e_z.$$
Kinetic energy of the system is
$$T=\frac{m}{2}|\boldsymbol v|^2,\quad \boldsymbol v=\frac{d}{dt}\boldsymbol{r}_m,$$
$$\boldsymbol{r}_m=x\boldsymbol e_x+r\boldsymbol e_y,$$
$$\boldsymbol v=\frac{d}{dt}\boldsymbol{r}_m=\dot x\boldsymbol e_x+x\boldsymbol\omega\times \boldsymbol e_x+r\boldsymbol\omega\times \boldsymbol e_y.$$
The Lagrangian is ##L=T##. Up to a total derivative we finally obtain ##L## as I wrote above.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251122_095217.webp
    Screenshot_20251122_095217.webp
    22.3 KB · Views: 1
  • #10
anuttarasammyak said:
No tension in the winded wire.
Once again: when we consider the mathematical pendulum we are not interested in whether the wire tightened or not. We consider an ideal constraint. Here is the same.
 
  • #11
I am sorry for my poor English. Tension force is zero. The wire outside the disk is straight and becomes short with pace ##r\Omega## during winding up operation around the disk bobbin.

Wire tension T is the only force acting on mass m so we need to know how it takes place. Does your Lagrangian help to understand it ?
 
Last edited:
  • #12
anuttarasammyak said:
Wire tension T is the only force acting on mass m so we need to know how it takes place. Does your Lagrangian help to understand it ?
Sure. The Second Newton is ##m\boldsymbol {\dot v}= \boldsymbol R.## Here ##\boldsymbol R =R\boldsymbol e_x## stands for the tension force. The Lagrange equation in terms of the variable ##\xi## is trivially integrated and we can express ##R## as a function of ##t## and initial conditions.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
560
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K