- #3,396
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,486
- 9,719
Today I Learned this exists:
Might be a surprise for anyone on the porch.
Might be a surprise for anyone on the porch.
mfb said:Our days. Rotation periods are very difficult to measure and astronomers wouldn't write days then.
hilbert2 said:https://phys.org/news/2020-09-astronomers-earth-sized-pi-planet-day.html
But is it 3.14 Earth days or 3.14 times its own day? If the latter, then any alien intelligent being would notice this curious fact, too.
mfb said:Our days. Rotation periods are very difficult to measure and astronomers wouldn't write days then.
We can do the math to see if it's at least in the ballpark!hilbert2 said:Yeah, I understood that it's almost certainly Earth days. And a planet orbiting a star that close to it is usually tidally locked, as far as I know (not being a specialist in this).
It orbits a cool, low-mass star that is about one-fifth the size of the sun. The planet circles its star every 3.14 days, at a blistering 81 kilometers per second, or about 181,000 miles per hour.
It was new to me too, since I don't rappel or rope climb very often. The word is derived from German verb abseilen, to rope down, or lower by rope, or rappel. One can also use 'sich abseilen'.Tom.G said:TIL a new word, "abseiling."
Used by @Astronuc in post:
https://www.physicsforums.com/posts/6400047/
Google says; British: ... descending a rock face or other near-vertical surface by using a doubled rope coiled round the body and fixed at a higher point.
TIL a new word "rappel". It means "abseil".Astronuc said:It was new to me too, since I don't rappel or rope climb very often. The word is derived from German verb abseilen, to rope down, or lower by rope, or rappel. One can also use 'sich abseilen'.
When I saw the word, I figured that it must have German origin. Rappel has a French origin.DrGreg said:TIL a new word "rappel". It means "abseil".
Strange how some words don't travel. "Abseil" is well-known (to the general public) in the UK, but "rappel" isn't.
The German word is "abseilen". ab for down and seil for rope. We also use it if we want to leave a place secretly, e.g. leaving a party or meeting early, in which case it is used reflexive: sich abseilen = to abseil oneself.Tom.G said:TIL a new word, "abseiling."
Used by @Astronuc in post:
https://www.physicsforums.com/posts/6400047/
Google says; British: ... descending a rock face or other near-vertical surface by using a doubled rope coiled round the body and fixed at a higher point.
I've just read the Wikipedia article, and they do do it upside down, i.e. facing downwards and away from the rock face or building, the opposite of what I understood as "abseiling".Astronuc said:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_rappel
I would have thought Aussie rappelling, or abseiling, would be doing it upside down.
As opposed to "sich aufseilen" = to pull oneself up by rope?fresh_42 said:We also use it if we want to leave a place secretly, e.g. leaving a party or meeting early, in which case it is used reflexive: sich abseilen = to abseil oneself.
Never heard before, but it's in the dictionary.Astronuc said:As opposed to "sich aufseilen" = to pull oneself up by rope?
Here is the explanation. The user who added that template argues that rappelling is more widely used and should be preferred.Astronuc said:I was also surprised by the note on the Wikipedia page about Abseiling: "This article may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies." Seriously?!
I suppose neither of us knows some of these guys:mfb said:I never heard "aufseilen" before either.
Today I learned that there are asymmetric fish that specialise in eating from one side of their prey.BillTre said:Some cichlids eat the scales off of other cichlids as a major nutritional component. They have a handedness to their mouth so they specialize in eating scales from one side of their prey.
Please define or approximate "several."hilbert2 said:...several 9 V batteries connected in series...
Tom.G said:Please define or approximate "several."
hilbert2 said:but you probably don't want to combine enough batteries to equal the intended voltage.
This page suggests you need hundreds of volts if you don't preheat the electrodes.hilbert2 said:You can make a tube lamp light up a bit by taking the voltage from several 9 V batteries connected in series
Swamp Thing said:Would about 50 volts be enough to see some glow? If so, you could safely let the current pass through you from fingertip to fingertip.
Keith_McClary said:This page suggests you need hundreds of volts if you don't preheat the electrodes.
There is an LED replacement.