- 7,819
- 13,151
Sorry if I ruined your setup by giving away the punchline.nsaspook said:I think there was a movie about an alternative source.
Sorry if I ruined your setup by giving away the punchline.nsaspook said:I think there was a movie about an alternative source.
No, that was it.WWGD said:Sorry if I ruined your setup by giving away the punchline.
I don't think the cricket flour is what makes those candy bars expensive. It's the other gourmet ingredients plus the fact they probably haven't achieved the cheapest possible mass production methods.WWGD said:I don't mean to be alarmist, but given population growth, we may have no other viable long-term source of protein. We may be passing the costs out somewhere in the system when we pay $4-5 for a burger or even $10+ for a steak.
As for Soylent Green, it might work as an alternative protein source were it introduced into the system indirectly as cricket feed:Captive crickets are omnivorous: when deprived of their natural diet, they will accept a wide range of different organic foodstuffs. Some species are completely herbivorous, feeding on flowers, fruit and leaves, with ground-based species consuming seedlings, grasses, pieces of leaf and the shoots of young plants. Others are more predatory and include in their diet invertebrate eggs, larvae, pupae, moulting insects, scale insects and aphids.[12] Many are scavengers and consume various organic remains, decaying plants, seedlings and fungi.[13] In captivity, many species have been successfully reared on a diet of ground up, commercial dry dog food, supplemented with lettuce and aphids.[12]
Crickets have relatively powerful jaws, and several species have been known to bite humans.
zoobyshoe said:...
At this point, I'm curious to know what those who farm the crickets feed the crickets...
Things with mass traves at different speed. Trains travel for example, 100Kmh, cars at 40kmh, air planes at 1000kmh. But, do things without mass ALWAYS always travel at "this" universal speed limit?
Today I learned that the massless photon is not heavy it is light. Is that why photon always travels at the speed of light?Yes
I don't know. I just read somewhere if the photon does not have mass but they have momentum.Enigman said:
If the speed of light is the speed of photon(because we see light by photon entering our retina) then speed of light is not c. Altough c itself is constant. So photon can't never travel at c if it has mass, because then ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-(\frac{v}{c})^2}}## would be infinite, no matter how small the mass is. I don't know, I'm not an expert at particle physics much less SR. Do anybody know, supposed if photon has mass, how much is it compared to neutrino?If the mass weren't zero, the speed of light would not be constant; but from a theoretical point of view we would then take c to be the upper limit of the speed of light in vacuum so that we can continue to ask whether c is constant.
Oh, and I just remember the formula for momentum is ##momentum = mv## if I'm not mistaken. If m is zero, than mv is zero?? Hmmh..., okay, I'll let that pass. Strange thing here isn't it.Enigman said:Okay, so here goes...
Photon is a particle representing a quantum of light. Photons don't have mass. What they do have is momentum and energy.
c is constant and the highest speed achievable. Photons travel at c in vacuum. In other mediums like air, water, glass, etc. the speed is slower than c.
Neutrino DO have mass but it is tiny, with a magnitude of somewhere between the order of 10 -36 and 10 -39 kg
Planck?? Is it something like quantum thing? Okay, okay I think we should stop here, before we get banned by admin for discussing specific detail about something in this thread.Enigman said:That is the classical formula. Relativity gives ##p=\gamma . mv## or ##p=E/c##
The first is invalid for light as lorentz factor is no defined for light. E=hv for light, so
##p=h/\lambda## is the momentum for light.
(##\lambda## is wavelength, h is Planck's constant and p is momentum)
No.Stephanus said:But photon ALWAYS travels at the speed of light doesn't itBecause we measure the speed of light (not c, as I just understand) by the speed of protons entering our sensor (retina, radar, etc)
I wouldn't worry about it. It's not so bad once you get used to it.Silicon Waffle said:I am worried someone will turn me crazy one day
The Antonov An-225 Mriya (Ukrainian: Антонов Ан-225 Мрія, Russian: Антонов Ан-225 Мрия, Dream, NATOreporting name: "Cossack") is a strategic airlift cargo aircraft that was designed by the Soviet Union's Antonov Design Bureau in the 1980s. The An-225's name, Mriya (Мрiя) means "Dream" (Inspiration) in Ukrainian. It is powered by six turbofan engines and is the longest and heaviest airplane ever built, with a maximum takeoff weightof 640 tonnes. It also has the largest wingspan of any aircraft in operational service. The single example built has the Ukrainian civil registration UR-82060. A second airframe was partially built; its completion was halted because of lack of funding and interest.
Yep, it's the one that Yuri and John Cussack and Armanda Peet ride in 2012.zoobyshoe said:I thought the largest airplane ever built was the Spruce Goose, but today I learned it was a Russian cargo plane:
zoobyshoe said:I thought the largest airplane ever built was the Spruce Goose, but today I learned it was a Russian cargo plane:
Today I learned the actual name of the Spruce Goose was the H-4 Hercules. I didn't know that.OmCheeto said:The Hercules is the largest flying boat ever built and has the largest wingspan of any aircraft in history. [per wiki]
Let's hope the students are not too dense.DrGreg said:Today I learned there's a "Singularity University".
Surely its name is blown up out of all proportion?![]()
Or naked.mfb said:...
Let's hope the students are not too dense.
I passed the same place a couple of weeks ago, and the coast-bound traffic was congested.OmCheeto said:I just passed the Spruce Goose on Sunday.