Torque-Free Precession in Classical & Quantum Mechanics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter espen180
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precession
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on torque-free precession in both classical and quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the precession of asymmetric rotating objects. The classical mechanics equation I_i \dot{\omega_i}=(\vec{L}\times \vec{\omega})_i is established, leading to the precession equations for angular velocities. The user inquires about the quantum mechanical description of this phenomenon and proposes a Hamiltonian approach using \hat{H}=\frac{1}{2} \hat{\vec{\omega}}I\hat{\vec{\omega}}. A suggested Hamiltonian for quantum treatment is \hat{H} = \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{ij} \hat{L}_i I^{-1}_{ij} \hat{L}_j, which incorporates the inverse of the inertia tensor.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics, specifically torque-free precession.
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and Hamiltonian formalism.
  • Knowledge of angular momentum operators and their properties.
  • Concept of inertia tensor and its inverse in rotational dynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the quantum mechanical treatment of angular momentum operators.
  • Explore the role of the inertia tensor in quantum systems.
  • Study the implications of non-commuting operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the precession of diatomic molecules in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers interested in the intersection of classical and quantum rotational dynamics.

espen180
Messages
831
Reaction score
2
In classical mechanics, an asymmetric rotating object will generally precess. Expressed in the body-fixed normal system of the object, we have I_i \dot{\omega_i}=(\vec{L}\times \vec{\omega})_i where L_i=I_i\omega_i.

Choosing a simple example where I_1=I_2, we obtain \dot{\omega_3}=0 and, for \Omega=\frac{I_1-I_3}{I_1}\omega_3,
\dot{\omega_1}=\Omega \omega_2
\dot{\omega_2}=-\Omega \omega_1
describing the precession. Thus, \vec{\omega}(t)=(A\cos(\Omega t) , A\sin(\Omega t), \omega_3).

My question is; can this motion be described quantum mechanically?

My first guess was to write the Hamiltionian as \hat{H}=\frac12 \hat{\vec{\omega}}I\hat{\vec{\omega}} with I being the inertia tensor. The difficulty is then to describe \hat{\vec{\omega}} in terms of \hat{x},\hat{p_x} etc.

Am I going about this the wrong way?
Is there any treatment of this problem available? I tried searching, but all the treatments of precession I found were related to magnetic moment precession.

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
That would still be concidered precession by an external torque, which is not what I am interested in here. Diatomic molecules don't experience free precession. I am sorry if I worded the problem poorly.

What I am interested in is the kind of precession the rotational axis of the Earth experiences, but at the quantum level. For example, a free spinning molecule of white phosphorus (tetrahedral molecule) would experience precession.
 
I see what you mean.

Try the following Hamiltonian:

\hat{H} = \frac{1}{2} \sum\limits_{ij} \hat{L}_i I^{-1}_{ij} \hat{L}_j

where I^{-1}_{ij} is the invserse of the inertia tensor. In the normal system I^{-1}_{ij} = \delta_{ij} \frac{1}{I_i}

The angular momentum operator L is well defined, and the moment of inertia can be taken as constant.

If I am not mistaken, then L does not commute with the Hamiltonian, so that you get precession.
 
Great! I'll try it.
Thank you very much! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K