Torque/Static Equilibrium/Forces problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter aliaze1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a static equilibrium problem involving a rigid beam supported at both ends, with a student standing on it. The participants are exploring how to calculate the upward force exerted by one of the supports while considering the effects of torque and weight distribution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of torque equations and the placement of the center of mass. There are questions about whether to include the mass of the beam and how to account for the forces acting on the system. Some participants are considering the implications of ignoring one of the supports in their calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on setting up the problem and clarifying assumptions. There is acknowledgment of previous errors in reasoning, and some participants have sought help from tutors to refine their understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on understanding the forces and torques involved without arriving at a definitive solution.

aliaze1
Messages
173
Reaction score
1
Torque/Static Equilibrium/Forces problem...

I have been working on this problem for a few hours, but I just can't get it ...

Homework Statement

Problem:

A 3.0-m-long rigid beam with a mass of 100 kg is supported at each end. An 80 kg student stands 2.0 m from support 1. How much upward force does support 1 exert on the beam?

here is an image:

http://photo.ringo.com/208/208651783O865465193.jpg

----

Homework Equations



τ=Frsinφ
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured out the torques kinda, but do i use the mass as (2/3*100)+80? or (2/3*100)+40...either way i kept getting a wrong answer...

and the center of mass i assume is where the person is right? bec the 80kg addition would be the most massive point right?

since the angles are 90 degrees, the sine of φ doesn't matter right?, i mean it would only affect the sign +/- of the answer...since τ=Frsinφ, and φ is either 90 or -90 degrees...

idk...basically i just can't get this...

i got solutions ranging from 76.666.., 1306.666... etc...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assume the weight of the beam acting at the center of the beam, and set the sum of all torques with respect to support B equal zero.
 
radou said:
Assume the weight of the beam acting at the center of the beam, and set the sum of all torques with respect to support B equal zero.

so do i pretend support 2 doesn't exist? and then just find the torque for support 1 using [80kg+(2/3*100)] as the mass?
 
Last edited:
aliaze1 said:
so do i pretend support 2 doesn't exist? and then just find the torque for support 1 using [80kg+(2/3*100)] as the mass?

Yes, you can pretend support 2 doesn't exist. Do you know how to draw a free body diagram? You have three forces acting - one is the weight of the bar, the second one is the weight of the person, and the third one is the force at support 1 you need to find.
 
lol...yea i got it, thanks, i went to a tutor today bec i was making small errors...i for the torque of the person, i was using the weight as (person+segment of rod), when its only supposed to be person

thanks for the help, greatly appreciated
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K