Torque to rotate a object on the ground about its own axis

Click For Summary
To calculate the torque required to rotate a square block on the ground with a coefficient of friction (COF) of 0.3, one can use the formula Torque = 2/3 * COF * m * g * r for a disc. The discussion highlights that breaking the block's footprint into sections can theoretically help in determining the torque, but it complicates the calculations as the number of sections increases. It is noted that the moment of inertia may be relevant for understanding the radial area distribution. The torque needed remains consistent regardless of how far the object is rotated, as it is primarily influenced by the frictional force, which is dependent on the weight and COF. The conversation emphasizes the importance of integrating forces over the shape's area to derive the required torque.
gaz097
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Does a equation exist for calculating torque for rotating a object about its cog axis where the only reaction forces are its own weight at a COF.
Hi,

I have an object sitting on the ground, with a coefficient of friction (COF) of 0.3.
Lets say it is a square block, and will rotate on its central axis.

How much torque is required to rotate this block? I am ignoring inertia weights as will be rotating very slowly.I can solve my problem by breaking the assumed footprint up into sections (Quadrants) and applying the force to slide the quadrant at its center point at a radius to the original shape, which works in theory but continues to increase in value the more sections it is broken up into and i imagine converging to a value. This sounds like a integral that i have forgotten many years ago.

Is this a constant for different COF values, shapes?
I assume an equation could exist for different equal shapes of torque, or at least for a circle.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
The block down force will be; F = m*g.
The force needed to translate the block will be; F= m*g*CoF .
The torque needed to rotate the block will be less, since there is less area, and an advantage near the neutral axis.

For a disc of radius r, and mass m.
Torque = 2/3 * CoF * m * g * r .
https://engineeringstatics.org/Chapter_09-disc-friction.html

Even though you are not concerned with inertia, the moment of inertia of a rotating square will be useful in determining the radial area distribution of the footprint.
 
Last edited:
gaz097 said:
Summary: Does a equation exist for calculating torque for rotating a object about its cog axis where the only reaction forces are its own weight at a COF.

I can solve my problem by breaking the assumed footprint up into sections (Quadrants) and applying the force to slide the quadrant at its center point at a radius to the original shape, which works in theory but continues to increase in value the more sections it is broken up into and i imagine converging to a value. This sounds like a integral that i have forgotten many years ago.
Not sure what you mean there -- applying the force to slide the quadrant at its center point at a radius to the original shape.

There are two ways to do this, actually a few more, but for a circle, the easier ones are,
Break the circle into thin circumferential r + dr's from 0 to R, find the torque on each, and add them all up.
Break the circle into thin wafer sized wedges, rdθ, find the torque on each, and add them all up.

It doesn't matter how far the circle is rotated, as the torque does not depend upon that, the same as for a translation, the force required to move the object any distance depends upon the friction f = μW.

so for the circle, and the wedge, if rotated dθ, the friction df on the wedge will be μdW.
Adding up the df's of all the wedges the friction will add up to μW ---- f = μW.

@gaz097 Can you find the torque required?
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
14K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K