Torques exerted by Gravity (CONFUSING)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving torques exerted by gravity on a door. The door's dimensions and mass are provided, and the goal is to determine the horizontal force at the bottom hinge while considering the torques acting on the door.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the torque exerted by gravity and equate it to the torque from the hinges. Questions arise regarding whether to divide the force by two due to the presence of two hinges and the nature of the torque calculation.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the reasoning behind the torque calculations and the role of the hinges. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to consider the angle between the radius and the force applied, and there is acknowledgment of the correctness of the original poster's approach. However, confusion remains about the application of cross products in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a specific online homework system and feedback from a professor, which suggests that the problem may have specific constraints or expectations that are not fully articulated in the discussion.

avenkat0
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A door with symmetry and of m 43.1 kg is 4.76 m high and 2.68 wide. The hinges are placed all the way on top and all the way on the bottom of the door. Find the absolute value of the horizontal force supplied by the bottom hinge.

Homework Equations


Sum of torques = 0
Torque = R x F

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried finding the torque exerted by gravity... and equaling that to the torque exerted by the hinges...
F(L)=W/2(mg)
now would i divide the force by 2 since there are 2 hinges?
or is my reasoning wrong from the first place?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning is correct. Note that your answer had nothing to do with the top hinge, so don't be dividing by anything.
 
Ohh ok i did exactly that and it came out to be wrong...
119.026 came out to be my answer...
 
That answer seems about right to me. (Is this one of those on-line homework systems?)
 
Yeah its webassign... i asked the professor and this is what he said:

First, draw a diagram showing the forces (including gravity) acting on the object. Next, pick a point of rotation. (Of course, you always pick a point that eliminates one or more of the unknowns.) And then, you apply the torque equation.

But that's exactly what i did... isn't it?
 
Yes, that's exactly what you did.
 
Doc Al... i contacted him again and i was told, "Its not just a product but a CROSS PRODUCT"...
but in a vertical door arent all the torques exerted by gravity perpendicular??
im confused
 
avenkat0 said:
Doc Al... i contacted him again and i was told, "Its not just a product but a CROSS PRODUCT"...
but in a vertical door arent all the torques exerted by gravity perpendicular??
im confused

No, they're not all perpendicular. With respect to the axis of rotation, there is an angle between the radius and the force applied.
 
avenkat0 said:
Doc Al... i contacted him again and i was told, "Its not just a product but a CROSS PRODUCT"...
but in a vertical door arent all the torques exerted by gravity perpendicular??
im confused
It certainly is a cross-product, not just a scalar product, but what you did was fine. To find the torque due to gravity, you took the force (mg) and multiplied it by the perpendicular component of the distance to the axis (W/2). All perfectly correct.

Similarly for the horizontal force supplied by the hinge.

What you did was completely correct.

To express the point more mathematically (for the torque due to gravity):
[tex]\tau = \vec{R} \times \vec{F} = RF\sin\theta = F(R\sin\theta) = mg (W/2) = mgW/2[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K