Total derivative in action of the field theory

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the least action principle in field theory, specifically regarding total derivatives. The confusion arises from the transition between expressing a total derivative in terms of spacetime coordinates and its integration, particularly how the boundary terms vanish at spatial infinity. It is clarified that while variations of the field vanish at endpoints, considering spatial infinity ensures that contributions from the boundaries do not affect the integral. The differentiation of the term involving the four-vector leads to a contraction that simplifies the expression to the desired form. The integration approach is noted to be non-manifestly relativistic, suggesting a need for further exploration of proper time integration methods.
victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
When applying the least action I see that a term is considered total derivative.

Two points are not clear to me.

We say that first
$$\int \partial_\mu (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi) d^4x= \int d(\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)= (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)$$

And then because the variation at the spatial infinity vanishes this terms is equal to zero.

I do not get the calculation from $$\partial_\mu (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi) d^4x=\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial x^\mu} dtdxdydz$$ to

$$d(\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)=\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial t}dt+\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial x}dx+\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial y}dy+\frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial z}dz$$
$$\neq \frac {\partial (\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi)}{\partial x^\mu} dtdxdydz$$

Can you expand this to fill the gap for me.

Also, why we require "spatial infinity" here, isn't it also true that $$\delta \phi$$ in the $$\frac {\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi$$ vanishes at any two endpoints of the path, why we require infinity here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's set S^\mu=\frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi)}\delta \phi. As you can see, it has a free index, so its a four-vector.
Now if we differentiate it, we'll have \partial_\nu S^\mu(which is a 2nd rank mixed tensor). But what you want, is the contraction of this, which becomes:
<br /> \partial_\mu S^\mu=\partial_0 S^0+\partial_1 S^1+\partial_2 S^2+\partial_3 S^3<br />
So:
<br /> \partial_\mu S^\mu d^4 x=\partial_0 S^0 dt dx dy dz+\partial_1 S^1dt dx dy dz+\partial_2 S^2dt dx dy dz+\partial_3 S^3dt dx dy dz<br />
Given that you can do the integrations in any order, the result you wanted is concluded.

About your second question, its only that we take the spatial end points to be at infinity and the temporal ones, just two moments in time. But this isn't manifestly relativistic so I guess its better to integrate w.r.t. the proper time but I still don't know how to do that, I should work on it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
375