Total distance traveled by particle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the total distance traveled by a particle represented by the position function s(t) = 2t^3 - 21t^2 + 60t over a time interval of 3 seconds. Participants debate whether to compute the total distance by evaluating the position function at discrete time points (s(0), s(1), s(2), s(3)) and summing the absolute differences, or by differentiating the function to find velocity and determining when it equals zero to identify changes in direction. The standard approach involves differentiation to analyze the particle's movement direction, while an alternative method is proposed for direct distance calculation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically differentiation and integration.
  • Familiarity with position functions and their graphical representations.
  • Knowledge of velocity and its relationship to position functions.
  • Ability to compute absolute values and perform basic arithmetic operations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to differentiate polynomial functions, specifically focusing on cubic functions like s(t) = 2t^3 - 21t^2 + 60t.
  • Study the concept of critical points and their significance in determining intervals of motion.
  • Explore the method of calculating total distance traveled using definite integrals for continuous functions.
  • Investigate the implications of changing the position function, such as s(t) = 4t^2 - 4t + 1, on the total distance calculation.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching motion concepts, and anyone interested in understanding particle dynamics and distance calculations in physics.

BrownianMan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
If s(t) = 2t^3 - 21t^2 + 60t is the position function of a particle moving in a straight line, would you be able to find its total distance traveled in, say 3 seconds, by finding s(0), s(1), s(2), s(3), and calculating the absolute value between each of them and then summing those values, as opposed to differentiating the function first, setting the derivative to 0, and solving for t?

Would you get the same answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you hope to gain by setting ds/dt to 0?
 
That's the standard way of solving such a problem - or at least how we've been taught. You differentiate to find the velocity, then set velocity to 0 to find the intervals when the particle is moving in a positive and in a negative direction.
 
OK, just making sure you understand. What would happen in both cases if the function was say, s(t) = 4t2-4t+1?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K