Total pressure and Static Pressure and V

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between total pressure (Pt) and static pressure (Ps) in the context of an aerofoil tested in a wind tunnel. Participants explore the implications of pressure measurements obtained from manometers and the calculation of freestream velocity based on these pressures.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the expected relationship between total pressure and static pressure, noting that their measured total pressure (11.4 mm) is less than static pressure (16.8 mm).
  • Another participant suggests that the measurements may be from a pitot-static tube, which combines total and static pressure measurements, and questions whether the dynamic pressure can be negative.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of swapping Pt and Ps to calculate freestream velocity, with a participant stating that this is only permissible if the flow direction is reversed.
  • One participant emphasizes that total pressure should always be greater than or equal to static pressure and suggests that the original poster may have miscalculated the pressure difference.
  • Another participant reiterates the point about the relationship between total and static pressure, explaining how manometer readings can be interpreted based on the pressure acting on the water columns.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that total pressure should be greater than or equal to static pressure. However, there is disagreement regarding the interpretation of the measurements and the implications for calculating freestream velocity, with no consensus on the original poster's confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the potential misinterpretation of pressure measurements and the conditions under which the measurements were taken, including the setup of the manometers and the atmospheric conditions affecting the readings.

Ma77h3w
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Confusion... I'm probably being stupid but...
Aerofoil in a wind tunnel... there are lots of pressure tappings including Pt and Ps (static and total pressure freestream) these are currently in mm on a manometer..
my Pt is 11.4mm and Ps is 16.8mm.. (SG=0.8)
1st question: Should total pressure be less than static? because i can't solve the equation to find free stream velocity.. rearranging: Pt - Ps = 1/2 p V^2 (p = density)
as Pt - Ps is negative.. hence finding V is impossible.. can't root a negative. Have i mixed the two up?
however my Cp against x/c graph looks good.. and swapping Pt and Ps messes it up..

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure, I don't have access to the experiment anymore. What difference would using a pito static tube make?
Can the Dynamic pressure (Pt - Ps) be negative in this situation? And am I allowed to swap them around (Ps - Pt) to work out the freestream velocity?
All the other pressure tappings on the aerofoil itself at 0 incidence are between 15 and 19mm. It's only the so called Pt that's as low as 11.4mm.. Thought: maybe I'm being silly and the lower the (mm manometer fluid) the greater the pressure...? Confusion reigns
for information manometer (table?) is at 20 degrees and fluid = 800 kg/m3
 
Ma77h3w said:
What difference would using a pito static tube make?
The static and total ports are linked together to do the subtraction for you, providing one number for your data: the velocity pressure.
Can the Dynamic pressure (Pt - Ps) be negative in this situation? And am I allowed to swap them around (Ps - Pt) to work out the freestream velocity?
Not unless the flow direction was backwards.
All the other pressure tappings on the aerofoil itself at 0 incidence are between 15 and 19mm. It's only the so called Pt that's as low as 11.4mm.. Thought: maybe I'm being silly and the lower the (mm manometer fluid) the greater the pressure...? Confusion reigns
for information manometer (table?) is at 20 degrees and fluid = 800 kg/m3
Without knowing what the port that is labeled "Pt" really is, it is tough to help. But total pressure can't be less than static pressure...

...or are these other ports that are labeled as static pressure acutally pressure ports along the profile of the airfoil? In that case, they aren't freestream static pressure.
 
Total P is always greater than or equal to static pressure

I guess u r wrongly calculating the pressure difference... let me guess..
u would have connected the pitot tube(measures tot P) to a manometer (A) at the top
Static tube(measures Static P) to another manometer (B) at the top...
Condition: both manometers exposed on the other tube to same atmospheric conditions

Now u have less pressure acting on the water column at B.. so the water level will be higher, say h2; on the other hand u ve more pressure acting on the water column at A.. so its level will be lower, say h1..

This implies, higher P keeps the water column lower... so u would have calculated the pressure diff as rho*g*(h2-h1) which is actually (Tot P-Static P)... Now u cud get the vel right
 
manicks said:
Total P is always greater than or equal to static pressure

I guess u r wrongly calculating the pressure difference... let me guess..
u would have connected the pitot tube(measures tot P) to a manometer (A) at the top
Static tube(measures Static P) to another manometer (B) at the top...
Condition: both manometers exposed on the other tube to same atmospheric conditions

Now u have less pressure acting on the water column at B.. so the water level will be higher, say h2; on the other hand u ve more pressure acting on the water column at A.. so its level will be lower, say h1..

This implies, higher P keeps the water column lower... so u would have calculated the pressure diff as rho*g*(h2-h1) which is actually (Tot P-Static P)... Now u cud get the vel right

Can you not use text speak please.
 
Cyrus said:
Can you not use text speak please.

okay...hereafter i will be conscious about that.. thank you
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
7K