Total, transitive, not anti-symmetric orderings

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter noowutah
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of total orders in a multi-dimensional, real-numbered vector space X. It establishes that while total orders are typically transitive and antisymmetric, the specific case presented is only transitive and total, lacking antisymmetry. The user seeks conditions under which a total and transitive order can be proven to be antisymmetric, suggesting that such orders may only consider one dimension of the vector space. Ultimately, the user acknowledges that their initial claim regarding the nature of these orderings is incorrect and requires re-articulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of total orders in mathematics
  • Familiarity with transitive and antisymmetric properties
  • Knowledge of multi-dimensional vector spaces
  • Basic concepts of real-numbered relations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of total orders in mathematical literature
  • Study transitive relations and their implications in vector spaces
  • Explore antisymmetry in order theory
  • Investigate examples of orderings in multi-dimensional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of orderings in vector spaces.

noowutah
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
I have a total order on a multi-dimensional, real-numbered vector space X. This means that for any vectors x,y\in{}X either xRy or yRx. Total orders are usually transitive, total, and antisymmetric (if xRy and yRx then x=y), but this one is not necessarily antisymmetric, it is only transitive and total. Which further conditions do I need to prove that it is antisymmetric, ie. xRy and yRx imply x=y just based on the fact that the ordering is total and transitive? One example of a transitive, total ordering which is not antisymmetric is one that uses only one coordinate of the vector and the usual less than (\geq) or greater than (\leq) relations: xRy if and only if x_{i}>y_{i} for some fixed i, and we ignore all other coordinates, all x_{j} for j\neq{}i. I have a hunch that ALL transitive, total orderings that are not antisymmetric are of this type. How could I formalize and prove this claim?

The claim, in other words, is that the only transitive, total, not-antisymmetric orderings R of a n-dimensional, real-numbered vector space are those which only consider one dimension and disregard the others. Let R be a such an ordering. Then there exists a transitive, total, antisymmetric ordering R' of the real numbers such that for a fixed k\in\{1,\ldots,n\} xRy if and only if x_{k}R'y_{k}. How would I prove this (and is it correct)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking myself out of the NR category. Don't bother answering this one. The claim is patently false and needs to be re-articulated. Sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
483
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K