Trace, determinant, and eigenvalues 3x3

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 15K views
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Use the trace and determinant to compute eigenvalues.

I know how to do this with a 2x2 but not sure how to do it with a matrix of nxn where n>2.

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}<br /> \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{5}\\ <br /> \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{2}{5}\\ <br /> \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{2}{5}<br /> \end{bmatrix}[/tex] the det=0 and the trace=[tex]\frac{37}{30}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think it's possible for n>2 cases, you can probably work out infinite number of matrices with the same trace & det, but with different eigenvalues
 
You can't use only the determinant and trace to find the eigenvalues of a 3x3 matrix the way you can with a 2x2 matrix. For example, suppose that det(A) = 0 and tr(A) = t. Then any matrix of the form:

[tex] \begin{bmatrix}<br /> a & 0 & 0\\ <br /> 0 & t-a & 0\\ <br /> 0 & 0 & 0\\ <br /> \end{bmatrix}[/tex]

has trace = t and determinant 0 with eigenvalues a and t-a. So you'll have to go back to the matrix to find the eigenvalues.
 
kof9595995 said:
I don't think it's possible for n>2 cases, you can probably work out infinite number of matrices with the same trace & det, but with different eigenvalues

According to the book it can be done with this matrix.
 
Epiphany: since the determinant is 0, one of the eigenvalues has to be 0.
 
Now if we could just divide the determinant of the matrix by zero and get back [tex]\lambda_1 \lambda_2[/tex]!
 
Dustinsfl said:
According to the book it can be done with this matrix.
Then I got no clue, sorry.