MHB Transfer function of a damped hanging mass

AI Thread Summary
To find the transfer function of a damped hanging mass system, the equations of motion for both masses must be correctly established. The input force \(u\) and the damping force \(F_d\) are defined, leading to the equations \(u - b(\dot{x}_1 + \dot{x}_2) = m(\ddot{x_1} + \ddot{x_2})\) and separate equations for each mass. The Laplace transforms yield equations that include both \(X_1(s)\) and \(X_2(s)\), complicating the derivation of the transfer function \(H(s) = \frac{X_1(s)}{U(s)}\). To isolate \(X_2(s)\), one approach is to express it in terms of \(X_1(s)\) using the established equations, allowing for simplification. The discussion emphasizes the need for careful modeling of the system dynamics to accurately derive the transfer function.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
How do I find the transfer function of damped masses hanging?

I know that the transfer function is
\[
H(s) = \frac{\mathcal{L}\{y(t)\}}{\mathcal{L}\{x(t)\}}
\]
where \(u\) is the input which is a force and \(x_1\) is the output.

Given the following diagram (see below), how do I find the input and output functions?

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x600q90/40/eh7q.png
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The force of damping is
\[
F_d = b\frac{dx}{dt}
\]
so by Newton's Law, the system can be written as
\[
u - b(\dot{x}_1 + \dot{x}_2) = m(\ddot{x_1} + \ddot{x}_2).
\]
Is this Correct?

How do I separate out the input from the output?
 
I tried modeling the forces separately but not sure if this is wise either.

For the first mass, we have $-b\dot{x}_1 = m\ddot{x_1}$, correct?

Now the second is $-b(\dot{x}_1 + \dot{x}_2) + u = m\ddot{x}_2$, correct?

I should be able to take the Laplace transform of both and end up with what I need to construct the transfer function which is
$$
H(s) = \frac{X_1(s)}{U(s)}.
$$
However, I still have and $X_2(s)$. Are my equations of motion wrong? If not, what am I doing incorrectly?

If take the Laplace transform of both, we have
\[
X_1(s)(s^2m + bs) = 0
\]
and
\[
X_2(s)(s^2m + sb) + sbX_1(s) - U(s) = 0
\]
The initial conditions are zero since when finding the transfer function, the initial conditions are zero by definition. If this is correct, how do I get rid of \(X_2(s)\)?
 
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top