Transformation for Lemaitre coordinates

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dale
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the transformation between Lemaitre coordinates and Schwarzschild coordinates in the context of general relativity, particularly for observers in a Schwarzschild spacetime. Participants explore the mathematical relationships and integrals necessary to express Schwarzschild coordinates in terms of Lemaitre coordinates, addressing both theoretical and practical implications of these transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe Lemaitre coordinates as beneficial for free-falling observers in Schwarzschild spacetime, noting the simplicity of their geodesics.
  • One participant proposes using differential transforms to write the Jacobian and Lemaitre basis vectors in terms of Schwarzschild basis vectors.
  • Another participant presents a Jacobian matrix derived from the transformation equations but expresses uncertainty about how to proceed to find ##t## and ##r## in terms of ##\tau## and ##\rho##.
  • A later reply suggests that integrating the transformation equations can yield expressions for ##r## and ##t##, but notes that multiple solutions may arise.
  • Participants discuss the limitations of the derived equations, indicating that the transformations may only hold for specific regions, such as inside or outside the Schwarzschild horizon.
  • One participant emphasizes the need to be cautious with singularities in the transformation functions, suggesting that different regions of spacetime may require separate considerations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of the transformation equations in various regions of spacetime, particularly concerning the behavior of the equations inside versus outside the horizon. There is no consensus on the best approach to handle these transformations across different regions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the integration of the transformation equations may lead to singularities, which complicates the process of finding solutions. The discussion highlights the importance of considering the specific conditions under which the transformations are valid.

Messages
36,644
Reaction score
15,484
TL;DR
I am looking for a transformation for Lemaitre coordinates to standard Schwarzschild coordinates.
Lemaitre coordinates are a nice set of coordinates for describing observers free-falling (aka rain observers) in a Schwarzschild spacetime. Such observers have very easy geodesics that are just constant coordinate ##\rho## and the time coordinate ##\tau## is equal to their proper time ##\sqrt{-ds^2}##.

The transformation between Lemaitre coordinates and Schwarzschild coordinates is given as: $$d\tau=dt+\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$$$d\rho=dt+\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$ where ##r## and ##t## are the Schwarzschild radial and time coordinates and ##\rho## and ##\tau## are the Lemaitre position and time coordinates and ##R## is the Schwarzschild radius.

I would like to get ##r## and ##t## in terms of ##\tau## and ##\rho##, but I don't actually know where to go from here. Can I just integrate like $$\int d\tau=\int dt+\int \sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$to get$$\tau=t+2 \sqrt{r R} - 2 R \tanh^{-1} \left( \sqrt{\frac{r}{R}} \right)$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the general approach is to use the differential transforms to write the Jacobian (or is it Jacobean?) and use that to write the Lemaitre basis vectors (trivial in Lemaitre coordinates) in terms of the Schwarzschild basis vectors. The integral curves of those two fields are your coordinate lines.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Ok, so the Jacobian would be $$
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
\frac{\partial \tau}{\partial t} & \frac{\partial \tau}{\partial r} \\
\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} & \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial r} \\
\end{array} \right) =
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
1 & \sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1 } \\
1 & \sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} \\
\end{array} \right)
$$

I am not sure where to go from here to get the ##t## and ##r## for a given ##\tau## and ##\rho##, either closed form or numerically.
 
Last edited:
Dale said:
I would like to get ##r## and ##t## in terms of ##\tau## and ##\rho##, but I don't actually know where to go from here. Can I just integrate like $$\int d\tau=\int dt+\int \sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$to get$$\tau=t+2 \sqrt{r R} - 2 R \tanh^{-1} \left( \sqrt{\frac{r}{R}} \right)$$
Yes you can! Inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemaître_coordinates, note that your two equations:$$d\tau=dt+\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left(1-\frac{R}{r}\right)^{-1}dr\,,\;d\rho=dt+\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\left(1-\frac{R}{r}\right)^{-1}dr\tag{1a,b}$$can be subtracted to get:$$d\left(\rho-\tau\right)=\frac{r\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}-\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\right)}{r-R}dr\tag{2}$$which integrates immediately to:$$\rho-\tau=\frac{2r^{2}\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}-\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\right)}{3\left(r-R\right)}\tag{3}$$Here I drop the arbitrary constant of integration since it can be absorbed by a choice of origin for the ##\tau## variable. Solving eq.(3) for ##r## yields multiple solutions, the simplest of which is:$$r=R^{1/3}\left(\frac{3}{2}\left(\rho-\tau\right)\right)^{2/3}\tag{4}$$Now as you point out, eq.(1a) integrates to:$$\tau=t+2\sqrt{R}\left(\sqrt{r}-\sqrt{R}\tanh^{-1}\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\right)\right)\tag{5}$$(again dropping the constant of integration). Inserting ##r## from (4) and solving for ##t## gives finally:$$t=\tau+2R\tanh^{-1}\left(\left(\frac{3\left(\rho-\tau\right)}{2R}\right)^{1/3}\right)-2\left(\frac{3R^{2}\left(\rho-\tau\right)}{2}\right)^{1/3}\tag{6}$$Eqs.(4) and (6) express the Schwarzschild coordinates ##r,t## in terms of the Lemaitre coordinates ##\rho,\tau\,##.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, cianfa72, Ibix and 2 others
Excellent, thanks @renormalize. It was just not occurring to me to eliminate one of the variables algebraically before integrating.
 
renormalize said:
$$\tau=t+2\sqrt{R}\left(\sqrt{r}-\sqrt{R}\tanh^{-1}\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\right)\right)\tag{5}$$
Playing around with this a little more, it looks like this only works for ##r<R## inside the horizon. For outside the horizon with ##R<r## we have to use

$$\tau=t+2\sqrt{R}\left(\sqrt{r}-\sqrt{R}\ \tanh^{-1}\left(\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\right)\right)\tag{5b}$$

The range of ##\tanh^{-1}## is (-1,1).
 
Dale said:
it looks like this only works for ##r<R## inside the horizon.
This will be true in general for any transformation between the Schwarzschild chart and a chart that doesn't have a coordinate singularity at the horizon: something has to change from one region to the other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cianfa72 and Dale
More generally, for two system of coordinates ##x## and ##y##, one has ##x^{\mu}=f^{\mu}(y)##, so
$$dx^{\mu}=f^{\mu}_{,\nu}(y)dy^{\nu}$$
If it happens that ##f^{\mu}_{,\nu}(y)## depends only on ##y^{\nu}##, then it can be integrated directly as
$$x^{\mu}=\int f^{\mu}_{,\nu}(y^{\nu})dy^{\nu}$$
as Dale did in the first post. However, if the function ##f^{\mu}_{,\nu}(y^{\nu})## is singular for some values of ##y^{\nu}##, then one has to be careful. Sometimes the integration over singular values is well defined and sometimes isn't. When it isn't, then it may be necessary to define the integral separately for different regions of spacetime separated by the singular values of ##y^{\nu}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale, JimWhoKnew and PeterDonis
Yes, so I think I need to go back and be more careful with both equations 4 and 6. I will try to do that sometime later this week
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
960
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K