Transformation for Lemaitre coordinates

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Dale
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transformation between Lemaitre coordinates and Schwarzschild coordinates in a Schwarzschild spacetime. The transformation equations are defined as $$d\tau=dt+\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$ and $$d\rho=dt+\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$, where ##R## is the Schwarzschild radius. The participants derive expressions for ##r## and ##t## in terms of ##\tau## and ##\rho##, ultimately arriving at $$r=R^{1/3}\left(\frac{3}{2}\left(\rho-\tau\right)\right)^{2/3}$$ and $$t=\tau+2R\tanh^{-1}\left(\left(\frac{3\left(\rho-\tau\right)}{2R}\right)^{1/3}\right)-2\left(\frac{3R^{2}\left(\rho-\tau\right)}{2}\right)^{1/3}$$. The discussion emphasizes the need for careful consideration of the integration process, especially near the event horizon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schwarzschild spacetime
  • Familiarity with differential geometry concepts
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations in general relativity
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of coordinate transformations in general relativity
  • Explore the properties of the Schwarzschild radius and its significance
  • Learn about the behavior of geodesics in various coordinate systems
  • Investigate the mathematical treatment of singularities in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in the field of general relativity, particularly those focusing on black hole physics and coordinate systems in curved spacetime.

Messages
36,615
Reaction score
15,434
TL;DR
I am looking for a transformation for Lemaitre coordinates to standard Schwarzschild coordinates.
Lemaitre coordinates are a nice set of coordinates for describing observers free-falling (aka rain observers) in a Schwarzschild spacetime. Such observers have very easy geodesics that are just constant coordinate ##\rho## and the time coordinate ##\tau## is equal to their proper time ##\sqrt{-ds^2}##.

The transformation between Lemaitre coordinates and Schwarzschild coordinates is given as: $$d\tau=dt+\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$$$d\rho=dt+\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$ where ##r## and ##t## are the Schwarzschild radial and time coordinates and ##\rho## and ##\tau## are the Lemaitre position and time coordinates and ##R## is the Schwarzschild radius.

I would like to get ##r## and ##t## in terms of ##\tau## and ##\rho##, but I don't actually know where to go from here. Can I just integrate like $$\int d\tau=\int dt+\int \sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$to get$$\tau=t+2 \sqrt{r R} - 2 R \tanh^{-1} \left( \sqrt{\frac{r}{R}} \right)$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the general approach is to use the differential transforms to write the Jacobian (or is it Jacobean?) and use that to write the Lemaitre basis vectors (trivial in Lemaitre coordinates) in terms of the Schwarzschild basis vectors. The integral curves of those two fields are your coordinate lines.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Ok, so the Jacobian would be $$
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
\frac{\partial \tau}{\partial t} & \frac{\partial \tau}{\partial r} \\
\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} & \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial r} \\
\end{array} \right) =
\left( \begin{array}{cc}
1 & \sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1 } \\
1 & \sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} \\
\end{array} \right)
$$

I am not sure where to go from here to get the ##t## and ##r## for a given ##\tau## and ##\rho##, either closed form or numerically.
 
Last edited:
Dale said:
I would like to get ##r## and ##t## in terms of ##\tau## and ##\rho##, but I don't actually know where to go from here. Can I just integrate like $$\int d\tau=\int dt+\int \sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left( 1-\frac{R}{r} \right)^{-1} dr$$to get$$\tau=t+2 \sqrt{r R} - 2 R \tanh^{-1} \left( \sqrt{\frac{r}{R}} \right)$$
Yes you can! Inspired by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemaître_coordinates, note that your two equations:$$d\tau=dt+\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\left(1-\frac{R}{r}\right)^{-1}dr\,,\;d\rho=dt+\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\left(1-\frac{R}{r}\right)^{-1}dr\tag{1a,b}$$can be subtracted to get:$$d\left(\rho-\tau\right)=\frac{r\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}-\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\right)}{r-R}dr\tag{2}$$which integrates immediately to:$$\rho-\tau=\frac{2r^{2}\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}-\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\right)}{3\left(r-R\right)}\tag{3}$$Here I drop the arbitrary constant of integration since it can be absorbed by a choice of origin for the ##\tau## variable. Solving eq.(3) for ##r## yields multiple solutions, the simplest of which is:$$r=R^{1/3}\left(\frac{3}{2}\left(\rho-\tau\right)\right)^{2/3}\tag{4}$$Now as you point out, eq.(1a) integrates to:$$\tau=t+2\sqrt{R}\left(\sqrt{r}-\sqrt{R}\tanh^{-1}\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\right)\right)\tag{5}$$(again dropping the constant of integration). Inserting ##r## from (4) and solving for ##t## gives finally:$$t=\tau+2R\tanh^{-1}\left(\left(\frac{3\left(\rho-\tau\right)}{2R}\right)^{1/3}\right)-2\left(\frac{3R^{2}\left(\rho-\tau\right)}{2}\right)^{1/3}\tag{6}$$Eqs.(4) and (6) express the Schwarzschild coordinates ##r,t## in terms of the Lemaitre coordinates ##\rho,\tau\,##.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, cianfa72, Ibix and 2 others
Excellent, thanks @renormalize. It was just not occurring to me to eliminate one of the variables algebraically before integrating.
 
renormalize said:
$$\tau=t+2\sqrt{R}\left(\sqrt{r}-\sqrt{R}\tanh^{-1}\left(\sqrt{\frac{r}{R}}\right)\right)\tag{5}$$
Playing around with this a little more, it looks like this only works for ##r<R## inside the horizon. For outside the horizon with ##R<r## we have to use

$$\tau=t+2\sqrt{R}\left(\sqrt{r}-\sqrt{R}\ \tanh^{-1}\left(\sqrt{\frac{R}{r}}\right)\right)\tag{5b}$$

The range of ##\tanh^{-1}## is (-1,1).
 
Dale said:
it looks like this only works for ##r<R## inside the horizon.
This will be true in general for any transformation between the Schwarzschild chart and a chart that doesn't have a coordinate singularity at the horizon: something has to change from one region to the other.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cianfa72 and Dale
More generally, for two system of coordinates ##x## and ##y##, one has ##x^{\mu}=f^{\mu}(y)##, so
$$dx^{\mu}=f^{\mu}_{,\nu}(y)dy^{\nu}$$
If it happens that ##f^{\mu}_{,\nu}(y)## depends only on ##y^{\nu}##, then it can be integrated directly as
$$x^{\mu}=\int f^{\mu}_{,\nu}(y^{\nu})dy^{\nu}$$
as Dale did in the first post. However, if the function ##f^{\mu}_{,\nu}(y^{\nu})## is singular for some values of ##y^{\nu}##, then one has to be careful. Sometimes the integration over singular values is well defined and sometimes isn't. When it isn't, then it may be necessary to define the integral separately for different regions of spacetime separated by the singular values of ##y^{\nu}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale, JimWhoKnew and PeterDonis
Yes, so I think I need to go back and be more careful with both equations 4 and 6. I will try to do that sometime later this week
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
880
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K