Transformations taking straight lines to straight lines

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 6K views
Palindrom
Messages
263
Reaction score
0
On R^n, I'd say the only smooth transformations taking straight lines to straight lines are the affine transformations.

Would I be right saying that?:smile:

How would one go about proving that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Palindrom said:
On R^n, I'd say the only smooth transformations taking straight lines to straight lines are the affine transformations.

Would I be right saying that?:smile:

How would one go about proving that?
I believe so.

Best wishes

Pete
 
If I'm not mistaken, Affine Transformations require that parallelism be preserved... however, Projective Transformations also take straight lines to straight lines without requiring parallelism.
 
I'm not familiar with the terminology used here, but surely if a map takes a straight line to another straight line, it is made of a translation + a rotation. So something like
 
robphy said:
If I'm not mistaken, Affine Transformations require that parallelism be preserved... however, Projective Transformations also take straight lines to straight lines without requiring parallelism.

The problem here then is that on R^n (as opposed to R^n unioned with an (n-1)-sphere at infinity) the transformation wouldn't be onto. In other words, if a transformation is a bijection on R^n and maps lines to lines, it must needs to map parallel lines to parallel lines.

If we're talking about non-bijections as well, then the projective transformations might be allowable.
 
quasar987 said:
I'm not familiar with the terminology used here, but surely if a map takes a straight line to another straight line, it is made of a translation + a rotation. So something like

You can also do a reflection