Transformations taking straight lines to straight lines

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 6K views
Palindrom
Messages
263
Reaction score
0
On R^n, I'd say the only smooth transformations taking straight lines to straight lines are the affine transformations.

Would I be right saying that?:smile:

How would one go about proving that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Palindrom said:
On R^n, I'd say the only smooth transformations taking straight lines to straight lines are the affine transformations.

Would I be right saying that?:smile:

How would one go about proving that?
I believe so.

Best wishes

Pete
 
I'm not familiar with the terminology used here, but surely if a map takes a straight line to another straight line, it is made of a translation + a rotation. So something like
 
robphy said:
If I'm not mistaken, Affine Transformations require that parallelism be preserved... however, Projective Transformations also take straight lines to straight lines without requiring parallelism.

The problem here then is that on R^n (as opposed to R^n unioned with an (n-1)-sphere at infinity) the transformation wouldn't be onto. In other words, if a transformation is a bijection on R^n and maps lines to lines, it must needs to map parallel lines to parallel lines.

If we're talking about non-bijections as well, then the projective transformations might be allowable.
 
quasar987 said:
I'm not familiar with the terminology used here, but surely if a map takes a straight line to another straight line, it is made of a translation + a rotation. So something like

You can also do a reflection