Transformer Problem Homework: Building a 1:1 Isolation Transformer

  • Thread starter Thread starter LdMorgan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transformer
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of a 1:1 isolation transformer using a modified microwave oven transformer core. Participants explore the design, calculations for coil turns, and the magnetic properties of the core material, particularly focusing on the implications of operating at high flux densities.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the physical modifications made to the transformer core and expresses a desire to achieve a specific magnetic flux of 16,000 gauss using pulsed DC current.
  • Another participant calculates the magnetic reluctance and the required magnetomotive force (mmf) for achieving 1.6 tesla, arriving at a need for 245 turns of wire.
  • Concerns are raised about the saturation flux density of the core material, with a suggestion to verify the core's material properties.
  • A participant notes the potential inefficiency of the transformer and discusses the characteristics of microwave oven transformers, suggesting that the core material may not be of high quality.
  • There is mention of using a magnetic simulation program to model the core, with a participant indicating discrepancies in the required number of turns based on simulation results.
  • Clarification is provided regarding the saturation levels of different core materials, specifically distinguishing between M6 and other alloys that can handle higher flux densities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the appropriate number of turns needed for the coils and the saturation characteristics of the core material. There is no consensus on the exact specifications or calculations, indicating ongoing uncertainty and exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention challenges with unit conversions and the limitations of the simulation software used for modeling the magnetic properties of the transformer core. There is also an acknowledgment of the need for further verification of material properties and calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in transformer design, magnetic properties of materials, and practical applications of electromagnetic theory in DIY projects.

LdMorgan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm working with a stripped-out microwave oven transformer core. I've split off a stack of laminations 1.25" thick, and cut out the middle leg of the "E" lams.

I want to build a hollow-core 1:1 isolation transformer, and input a slow (about 3 Hz) pulsed DC current through it that will cyclically induct the core to 16,000 gauss.

I am aware that this will be an inherently inefficient transformer. The current and power required do not particularly matter--it's the flux in the core that I want to tinker with.

The sectional area of the core is 0.744 sq. inches, and the Mean Path Length is 12.375 inches. The relative permeability of the core is (probably) 40,000. There is no air gap in the core.

I've been banging on the numbers for almost two weeks and I'm not making much headway, other than learning that transformers are a lot more complicated than they look.

I really need some help figuring out the coils for this critter.

So far I've gotten answers ranging from 12 to 223 turns of 30-ga magnet wire running at 0.13 amps, and I could be off by an order of magnitude, or more. And, somehow, I don't believe that a half a watt is the right amount of power...for a core that weighs about 4 lbs.

Homework Equations



If there are any around, they are definitely in hiding.

The Attempt at a Solution



Tried a lot of different ways, including working up an air core coil and correcting it for an iron core, but none of the answers I've gotten look even remotely reasonable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I've made some progress on this.

I have calculated the magnetic reluctance (R) using Hopkin's Law where R = the length of the magnetic circuit / the permeability of the material X the core sectional area.

I found the permeability by multiplying the relative permeability (40,000) by the magnetic constant (4 pi X EE10-7).

Accordingly, R worked out to 19.8943678.

Then I went back to the basic statement of Hopkin's Law that F = the flux X the magnetic reluctance.

For 1.6 tesla, F (the mmf required) worked out to 31.734 ampere-turns.

So...if I wind the coils from 30 ga magnet wire, and limit the working voltage to 0.13 amps, I'll need 245 turns.

Not too bad--I'll have plenty of room on the core.

This problem doesn't seem so horribly difficult now (given that I have things right here). I think much of my previous difficulty was keeping track of the units (CGS vs. SI) and not quite knowing where to start.

If this looks like a bad solve, someone please give me a yell.

Thanks, all!
 
Looks like you are doing some good work. My only comment would be to check the saturation flux density for the core. 1.6T is mighty high for a ferrous core. Do you know what material the core is made out of? Is it laminated iron (for 60Hz power conversion)? I couldn't tell if it was the power transformer core that you got out of the oven...

Welcome to the PF, BTW.
 
Yes, 1.6 tesla is about the most the core could possibly handle. It is/was the main power transformer from the microwave oven. Laminated and made for 60 Hz. The core was 2 1/2" thick before I split it, and probably handled 12000-15000 watts of power.

Even with low voltage input and half the core mass, I'm a little leery of the amount of power it may load up when almost fully saturated.

From what I've been reading, microwave oven transformers are usually cheap & inefficient because the manufacturer pays for the iron and copper, but the customer pays for the power it uses. So they're made to run over-saturated as a matter of course, and the excess heat (wasted energy) just gets fanned away.

Shoddy & cheap means the iron probably isn't M6 (which saturates at 2.3 tesla) but something somewhere between recycled tuna cans and re-rolled manhole covers.

Whatever the cheapest transformer iron is, that's probably what I'm working with.

But it's still a little early for precision because everything is make-do at this stage. I'm just happy to just have a starting point to work from.

I'm using a little 2D magnetic simulation program called Visimag which is a) free, b) simple, and c) free.

Did I mention the program is free? (Yay free!)

It's a great little program for total nubes like me. I've never done anything with magnetics before. (This is officially a Learning Experience!)

Vizimag has a full-version 30-day free trial, then you can buy it for $39.75. A very reasonable price. in my opinion.

It's available at http://www.vizimag.com/.

I modeled the core, and can get some good hints about it, but the program isn't 3D so I can't really simulate it accurately.

I tried out the numbers I came up with for the coils, and Vizimag tells me I'm off by an order of magnitude. That means I either lost a decimal when I converted the scientific notation, or the program is insufficiently 3D.

(Hmmm--probably both.)

It says I'll need 2450 turns to create the desired 1.6 tesla of flux in the circuit, so I'll probably wind up buying a fluxmeter.

In the meantime, I won't be shorting the coils out across my tongue...
 
Thanks, by the way, It's good to be here. I've been reading some really interesting stuff...
 
LdMorgan said:
Shoddy & cheap means the iron probably isn't M6 (which saturates at 2.3 tesla) but something somewhere between recycled tuna cans and re-rolled manhole covers.

M6 doesn't saturate at 2.3 tesla. Only alloys containing cobalt (such as permendur and supermendur) saturate at flux densities over 2 tesla.
 
Ah! Thanks--I'll have to recheck the spec sheet I was looking at.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
21K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K