MHB Transforming an integral of Exponential to a Contour

Click For Summary
The integral $$\int_{\gamma(0;1)}\exp(z) \mathrm{d}z$$ evaluates to zero since the function $$f(z) = \exp(z)$$ is holomorphic within and on the contour. By parameterizing the contour with $$z = e^{i\theta}$$, the integral can be transformed into a form involving $$\theta$$. The discussion focuses on showing that $$\int_0^{2\pi}\exp(\theta)\cos(\theta+\sin(\theta)) \mathrm{d}\theta = 0$$ by applying the residue theorem or Cauchy's integral theorem. The final conclusion is that the integral simplifies to zero due to the properties of holomorphic functions over closed contours.
shen07
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Hi friends, i need some help for this number:

By considering the integral $$\int_{\gamma(0;1)}\exp(z) \mathrm{d}z$$,show that

$$\int_0^{2\pi}\exp(\theta)\cos(\theta+\sin(\theta)) \mathrm{d}\theta = 0$$

i know that since $$f(z)=\exp(z)$$ is holomorphic on and inside $$\gamma(0;1)$$,$$\int_{\gamma(0;1)}\exp(z) \mathrm{d}z = 0$$

But now how do i transform it to a contour so that i can use that integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use $z=e^{i\theta }\,\,\,\, 0\leq \theta \leq 2\pi $

Now use the well-known formula for smooth curves and continuous function $f$

$$\int_{\gamma} f(z)\, dz = \int^b_a f(\gamma(t))\, \gamma'(t)\, dt $$

for $a\leq t \leq b $
 
ZaidAlyafey said:
Use $z=e^{i\theta }\,\,\,\, 0\leq \theta \leq 2\pi $

Now use the well-known formula for smooth curves and continuous function $f$

$$\int_{\gamma} f(z)\, dz = \int^b_a f(\gamma(t))\, \gamma'(t)\, dt $$

for $a\leq t \leq b $

I have worked out and simplify, can anyone tell me if it is correct and how can i continue with it.

$$on \gamma(0;1)\,\,\,\,\, cos(\theta+sin(\theta))= \frac{z^2+1}{2z} cos(\frac{z^2-1}{2iz})+i \frac{z^2-1}{2z} sin(\frac{z^2-1}{2iz})$$

i express it in terms of exponential, i.e

$$\frac{\sqrt{2z^4+2}}{2z}exp(\frac{z^2-1}{2iz})$$

Now this implies that my integral has been tranformed on $$\gamma(0;1)$$

$$\int_0^{2\pi}\exp(cos(\theta))\cos(\theta+sin( \theta)) \mathrm{d}\theta=\frac{-i}{2}\int_{\gamma(0;1)} exp(\frac{z^2+1}{2z})\,\,\frac{\sqrt{2z^4+2}}{z^2}\,\,exp(\frac{z^2-1}{2iz})\,\,\mathrm{d}z$$

Now I am stuck, how do i show that this integral is ZERO?
 
You are working in reverse which made things difficult .

We are given

$$\int_{\gamma(0,1)}\text{exp}(z)\, dz $$

Now we can paramatrize the circle $$\gamma(0,1)$$ as $$e^{it},\,\, 0\leq t \leq 2\pi $$

so applying the rule we get $$i\int^{2\pi}_0 \text{exp}(e^{it}) e^{it}\, dt=0$$
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K