Transforming Representations of SO(3) to Act on Vectors?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter silverwhale
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Representations So(3)
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of the special orthogonal group SO(3) and its application to quantum field theory (QFT). Participants clarify that while the Pauli sigma matrices represent a 2-dimensional spinor representation of SO(3), the 3-dimensional representation of SO(3) corresponds to vector representations acting on 3-component vectors. It is established that SO(3) and SU(2) are isomorphic in terms of their Lie algebras, but SU(2) serves as a double cover of SO(3), leading to distinct representations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between vector and spinor representations in the context of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups and Lie algebras, specifically SO(3) and SU(2).
  • Familiarity with quantum field theory (QFT) and representation theory.
  • Knowledge of Pauli matrices and their role in quantum mechanics.
  • Concept of irreducible and reducible representations in linear algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between SO(3) and SU(2) in greater detail.
  • Learn about projective representations and their implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the construction of irreducible representations of Lie groups.
  • Investigate the role of spin-1 particles and their vector representations in particle physics.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum mechanics, representation theory, and particle physics, as well as students learning about the mathematical foundations of quantum field theory.

  • #31
dextercioby said:
The truth is that you really need to read mathematics, because explaining the facts without understanding them right now won't help you too much.

The bolded part is incorrect.

I'm not really up to reccomendations to the elementary stuff, i.e. learning something from beginning. I really hate introductory texts and especially on the mathematics behind the physical theory.

I guess saying that:" SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), and SU(2) is isomorphic to the coset SO(3)/Z2." would have been the right statement although I am not sure what a double cover is.

Introductory texts are the basis, how then would one learn stuff? If not by some "introductory" text that relates to more pedestrian stuff?

Honestly, I do not hate introductory texts about the mathematics of a physical theory, those are the tools one needs to handle the model.. And at the end I want to calculate stuff and get results not just understand some axioms and be happy with it..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K