Transitional Reynolds Number When Analysing Flow Through Orifices

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating flow rates through orifices, focusing on the coefficient of discharge and the transitional Reynolds number as defined in "Hydraulic Control Systems" by Herbert E. Merritt. There is confusion regarding the transitional Reynolds number being defined as 9, while it is typically between 2300 and 3500 for fully developed pipe flow. Participants clarify that the transitional Reynolds number can vary significantly depending on the flow conditions, with different values applicable to boundary layers and non-fully developed flows. The conversation emphasizes that the commonly cited 2300 value is not a universal standard and that lower Reynolds numbers can still represent distinct flow regimes. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately analyzing flow through orifices.
WhiteWolf98
Messages
89
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
I'm looking at laminar flow through an orifice, and a textbook I'm using has defined the transitional Reynolds number in a fashion I don't understand.
Greetings,

I need to work out the flow rate of of a flow through an orifice, where the size of the orifice and differential pressure are varied. The primary unknown in working out flow rate is the coefficient of discharge. A textbook I've been using to help me is "Hydraulic Control Systems" by Herbert E. Merritt. In it, he talks about both laminar and turbulent flow through orifices, and defines the coefficient of discharge for both.

From my understanding, the coefficient of discharge only varies when the flow is laminar, and is a constant for turbulent flow. What I'm confused about is a way in which the transitional Reynolds number is defined in the textbook, right at the end of the section on laminar flow.

Orifice Laminar 1.png
Orifice Laminar 2.png
Orifice Laminar 3.png

It can be seen on page 45, the transitional Reynolds number is defined by 3-42. And it doesn't make any sense. Well, it does and it doesn't at the same time. How is it possible to have a transitional Reynolds number of 9, when the transitional Re number is generally between 2300 and 3500. Maybe I am being very dumb, but can someone else see what is going on here? Perhaps I am missing something crucial.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
WhiteWolf98 said:
How is it possible to have a transitional Reynolds number of 9
By definition, a very tiny velocity in a very tiny orifice?

Also, it is specified that equation 3-38 was found by analyzing flows with ##R \lt 10##, thus values in that region should be expected for equation 3-42 to be valid.
 
  • Like
Likes WhiteWolf98
WhiteWolf98 said:
TL;DR Summary: I'm looking at laminar flow through an orifice, and a textbook I'm using has defined the transitional Reynolds number in a fashion I don't understand.

Greetings,

I need to work out the flow rate of of a flow through an orifice, where the size of the orifice and differential pressure are varied. The primary unknown in working out flow rate is the coefficient of discharge. A textbook I've been using to help me is "Hydraulic Control Systems" by Herbert E. Merritt. In it, he talks about both laminar and turbulent flow through orifices, and defines the coefficient of discharge for both.

From my understanding, the coefficient of discharge only varies when the flow is laminar, and is a constant for turbulent flow. What I'm confused about is a way in which the transitional Reynolds number is defined in the textbook, right at the end of the section on laminar flow.

View attachment 353226View attachment 353224View attachment 353225
It can be seen on page 45, the transitional Reynolds number is defined by 3-42. And it doesn't make any sense. Well, it does and it doesn't at the same time. How is it possible to have a transitional Reynolds number of 9, when the transitional Re number is generally between 2300 and 3500. Maybe I am being very dumb, but can someone else see what is going on here? Perhaps I am missing something crucial.
What constitutes a reasonable value for transition Reynolds number depends on the problem. The 2300 you cite is specifically for fully developed pipe flow. You are not currently studying fully developed pipe flow, so your scalings are all different.

For a boundary layer, a reasonable transition Reynolds number might be ##10^6##. It's a failing of most mechanical engineering curricula that so many engineers finish fluid mechanics courses thinking that ##Re_{tr}=2300## is some kind of universal rule for transition.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes jack action and WhiteWolf98
jack action said:
By definition, a very tiny velocity in a very tiny orifice?

Also, it is specified that equation 3-38 was found by analyzing flows with ##R \lt 10##, thus values in that region should be expected for equation 3-42 to be valid.
Yes I saw this, that is a very tiny Reynolds number. The smallest Re number I'm dealing with is about 320. It's just bizarre to me to be talking about different flow regimes at such tiny values.

So depending on the conditions, are we saying that it's possible to get different flow regimes even at low Reynolds numbers?
 
boneh3ad said:
What constitutes a reasonable value for transition Reynolds number depends on the problem. The 2300 you cite is specifically for fully developed pipe flow. You are not currently studying fully developed pipe flow, so your scaling are all different.

For a boundary layer, a reasonable transition Reynolds number might be ##10^6##. It's a failing of most mechanical engineering curricula that so many engineers finish fluid mechanics courses thinking that ##Re_{tr}=2300## is some kind of universal rule for transition.
Think you've answered my question there as I was typing it.

I'll be honest, I did think that. Thank you for your response
 
  • Like
Likes boneh3ad, jack action and berkeman
Posted June 2024 - 15 years after starting this class. I have learned a whole lot. To get to the short course on making your stock car, late model, hobby stock E-mod handle, look at the index below. Read all posts on Roll Center, Jacking effect and Why does car drive straight to the wall when I gas it? Also read You really have two race cars. This will cover 90% of problems you have. Simply put, the car pushes going in and is loose coming out. You do not have enuff downforce on the right...
I'm trying to decide what size and type of galvanized steel I need for 2 cantilever extensions. The cantilever is 5 ft. The space between the two cantilever arms is a 17 ft Gap the center 7 ft of the 17 ft Gap we'll need to Bear approximately 17,000 lb spread evenly from the front of the cantilever to the back of the cantilever over 5 ft. I will put support beams across these cantilever arms to support the load evenly
Thread 'What's the most likely cause for this carbon seal crack?'
We have a molded carbon graphite seal that is used in an inline axial piston, variable displacement hydraulic pump. One of our customers reported that, when using the “A” parts in the past, they only needed to replace them due to normal wear. However, after switching to our parts, the replacement cycle seems to be much shorter due to “broken” or “cracked” failures. This issue was identified after hydraulic fluid leakage was observed. According to their records, the same problem has occurred...
Back
Top