Transitive Closure of Binary Relation T on A={0,1,2,3}

  • Thread starter Thread starter hansel13
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Binary Relations
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the transitive closure of a binary relation T defined on the set A = {0, 1, 2, 3}. The relation T is given as T = {(0,2), (1,0), (2,3), (3,1)}.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the number of pairs in the set A and the implications for the transitive closure T^t. There are attempts to clarify the definitions and properties of transitive relations. Some participants express confusion regarding the equivalence of pairs and the total count of elements in T^t.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the transitive closure and questioning the completeness of the original poster's findings. There is a recognition of the need to consider additional pairs, such as reflexive pairs, in the context of the transitive closure.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's count of elements in T^t may be incomplete and that the relation may not be symmetric. There is also a mention of the total number of pairs possible in A x A, which is relevant to understanding the transitive closure.

hansel13
Messages
51
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


T is a binary relation defined on A = {0, 1, 2, 3}.

Let T = {(0,2), (1,0), (2,3), (3,1)}

Find T^t, the transitive closure of T.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm going to skip using commas cause it takes to long

02 23 = 03
31 10 = 30
23 31 = 21
10 02 = 12
12 23 = 13
02 21 = 01
23 30 = 20
31 12 = 32

So, T^t = {(0,2), (1,0), (2,3), (3,1), (0,3), (3,0), (2,1), (1,2), (1,3), (0,1), (2,0), (3,2)}

Pretty sure this is right, if someone could let me know if I did anything wrong, I'd appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi hansel13! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
hansel13 said:
Pretty sure this is right, if someone could let me know if I did anything wrong, I'd appreciate it.

You've made it really long.

Hint: how many pairs are there in A? And how many are there in Tt? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi hansel13! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)


You've made it really long.

Hint: how many pairs are there in A? And how many are there in Tt? :wink:


4 pairs in A. So 8 in Tt? I still fail to follow...
 
i don't totally understand the question, but looking at your equivalence realtion, along with Tiny Tim's comments:

first, there's more than 4 pairs that can be made from A, & more than 8 in T^t

Let T = {(0,2), (1,0), (2,3), (3,1)}
then the way i read it, following through T gives: 0~2~3~1, so everything is equivalent in the transitive closure (ie contains all binary pairs)...?
 
hansel13 said:
4 pairs in A. So 8 in Tt? I still fail to follow...

uhh? you found 12 in Tt.

And A has 4 elements, so how many different pairs of elements are there (counting, for example, {0,3} and {3,0} as the same pair).

(if you can't calculate it, then just list them :wink:)
 
tiny-tim said:
uhh? you found 12 in Tt.

And A has 4 elements, so how many different pairs of elements are there (counting, for example, {0,3} and {3,0} as the same pair).

(if you can't calculate it, then just list them :wink:)

Sorry, meant 12 elements in Tt

I still don't follow. Why would {0,3} and {3,0} be the same?

OK By definition:
The transitive closure of T is the binary relation Tt on A that satisfies the following three properties:
1. Tt is transitive.
2. T is a subset of Tt.
3. If S is any other transitive relation that contains T, then Tt is a subset of S.

So doesn't T^t = {(0,2), (1,0), (2,3), (3,1), (0,3), (3,0), (2,1), (1,2), (1,3), (0,1), (2,0), (3,2)}?
 
if T is a symmetric binary relation then it satisfies
a~b iff b~a
so in that case (0,3) = (3,0)
 
hansel13 said:
So doesn't T^t = {(0,2), (1,0), (2,3), (3,1), (0,3), (3,0), (2,1), (1,2), (1,3), (0,1), (2,0), (3,2)}?

What about (0,0), (1,1), (2,2) and (3,3)? :wink:

(remember, a relation can be something like "=")
I still don't follow. Why would {0,3} and {3,0} be the same?

Sorry, I shouldn't have added that …

when you didn't answer my original question, I got confused and thought this was defined as a symmetric relation (which it wasn't).

Let's start again …

How many elements are there in Tt? And how many in A x A? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
What about (0,0), (1,1), (2,2) and (3,3)? :wink:

(remember, a relation can be something like "=")


Sorry, I shouldn't have added that …

when you didn't answer my original question, I got confused and thought this was defined as a symmetric relation (which it wasn't).

Let's start again …

How many elements are there in Tt? And how many in A x A? :smile:


Well I thought there are 12 elements in Tt. And 16 in A x A.

But I guess if we add (0,0),(1,1),(2,2),(3,3) then Tt would have 16 elements as well?
 
  • #10
So there are 16 elements in Tt?
 
  • #11
hansel13 said:
So there are 16 elements in Tt?

Yup! :biggrin:

So Tt is the whole of AxA …

now can you see a way of proving that, quicker than just listing all the elements? :wink:
 
  • #12
tiny-tim said:
Yup! :biggrin:

So Tt is the whole of AxA …

now can you see a way of proving that, quicker than just listing all the elements? :wink:

I guess since there's 4 pairs in T^t and 4 pairs in A, we'd need 16 pairs to have full closure.

thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
11K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K