Transmission over a linear barrier (QM)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the transmission coefficient (T) for a quantum mechanical plane wave encountering a linear potential barrier defined by an electric field (E). The potential is piecewise defined, with specific boundary conditions applied to the wave function, which is expressed using Airy functions. The user employed MATLAB for symbolic computation but encountered an anomaly where the transmission coefficient exceeded 1, indicating a potential error in either the mathematical formulation or the coding process. The conversation highlights the importance of verifying calculations against established solutions in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically wave functions and potential barriers.
  • Familiarity with Schrödinger's equation and boundary conditions.
  • Knowledge of Airy functions and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Proficiency in MATLAB for symbolic computation and numerical analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of transmission coefficients in quantum mechanics, focusing on linear potential barriers.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Airy functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in MATLAB coding for quantum mechanical problems.
  • Explore established solutions for transmission coefficients in similar potential scenarios, such as those found in academic journals.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists working with potential barriers, and anyone involved in computational physics using MATLAB.

cc94
Messages
19
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Suppose we have a potential such that $$
V =
\left\{
\!
\begin{aligned}
0 & \text{ if } x<0\\
\mathcal{E}x & \text{ if } x>0, x<L\\
\mathcal{E}L & \text{ if } x>L
\end{aligned}
\right.
$$

for some electric field ##\mathcal{E}##. I'm trying to find the transmission coefficient ##T## for a plane wave incoming from the left.

Homework Equations


Solving Schrödinger's equations, I believe we have:
$$
\psi =
\left\{
\!
\begin{aligned}
Ae^{ikx} + Be^{-ikx} & ; x<0\\
C\text{Ai}(\zeta) + D\text{Bi}(\zeta) & ; x>0, x<L\\
Fe^{i\kappa x} & ; x>L
\end{aligned}
\right.
$$

Where ##\zeta## is a change of variable involving ##x##, ##E##, and ##\mathcal{E}##, and we only keep a forward traveling wave for the region ##x>L##. Since one of the coefficients is arbitrary, we can choose ##F## = 1

Then we have boundary conditions:
$$\psi_I(0) = \psi_{II}(0) \\
<=> A + B = C\text{Ai}(\zeta_0) + D\text{Bi}(\zeta_0)$$
$$\psi_I'(0) = \psi_{II}'(0) \\
<=> ik(A - B) = C\text{Ai}'(\zeta_0)(\zeta'_0) + D\text{Bi}'(\zeta_0)(\zeta'_0)$$
$$\psi_{II}(L) = \psi_{III}(L) \\
<=> C\text{Ai}(\zeta_L) + D\text{Bi}(\zeta_L) = e^{i\kappa L}$$
$$\psi_{II}'(L) = \psi_{III}'(L) \\
<=> C\text{Ai}'(\zeta_L)(\zeta'_L) + D\text{Bi}'(\zeta_L)(\zeta'_L) = i\kappa e^{i\kappa L}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Then we get the matrix (using a little bit of shorthand):

$$\begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -\text{Ai}_0 & -\text{Bi}_0 & 0 \\
ik & -ik & -\text{Ai}'_0\zeta '_0 & -\text{Bi}'_0\zeta '_0 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & \text{Ai}_L & \text{Bi}_L & e^{i\kappa L} \\
0 & 0 & \text{Ai}'_L\zeta '_L & \text{Bi}'_L\zeta '_L & i\kappa e^{i\kappa L}
\end{bmatrix}$$

I used MATLAB to solve this symbolically, and then we know that ##T = \lvert\frac{F}{C}\rvert ^2 = \frac{1}{|C| ^2}##. So I plugged in various energies above the highest V and plotted T. But the transmission turns out to always be larger than 1, which makes no sense. Is my math wrong, or do I need to find a typo in my code somewhere? Has anyone solved this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I finally found the answer here: http://aapt.scitation.org/doi/10.1119/1.11582[/URL]. I don't know how he got it, because even using a diff eq solver I couldn't get that result. But I'll assume it's correct and I'm just missing something.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K