Can the Transverse Nature of a Wave from an Electron Gun be Observed?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the nature of waves emitted from an electron gun, specifically addressing whether these waves can be classified as transverse or longitudinal. Participants clarify that electrons are quantum particles exhibiting wave-particle duality, and thus do not fit neatly into classical wave categories. The conversation highlights the distinction between photons, which are transverse waves, and electrons, which possess spin and can be polarized. The complexity of defining wave characteristics in quantum mechanics is emphasized, particularly regarding the terminology used to describe these phenomena.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with the properties of photons and electrons, including polarization and spin.
  • Knowledge of classical wave theory and its limitations in quantum contexts.
  • Basic grasp of experimental physics techniques for observing quantum particles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the properties of photons, focusing on their transverse nature and polarization.
  • Explore electron polarization and its implications in experimental physics.
  • Learn about the experimental procedures used to observe and measure quantum wave characteristics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the behavior of quantum particles and their wave properties.

Martyn Arthur
Messages
128
Reaction score
25
TL;DR
How do we know that a wave fired from an electron gun is transverse in transit?
Hi.
What equipment /mechanism / experimental procedure is used to determine that the nature of a wave fired from an electron gun is transverse in transit?
Thanks
Martyn
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a wave propagates through vacuum, is it transverse or longitudinal?

Will your electron propagate through a vacuum?
 
Martyn Arthur said:
TL;DR Summary: How do we know that a wave fired from an electron gun is transverse in transit?

Hi.
What equipment /mechanism / experimental procedure is used to determine that the nature of a wave fired from an electron gun is transverse in transit?
Thanks
Martyn
An electron is a quantum particle. It's not a classical wave, and neither transverse nor longitudinal.
 
PeroK said:
An electron is a quantum particle. It's not a classical wave, and neither transverse nor longitufinal
But a photon is also a quantum particle, not a classical wave, and is only longitudinal.

That said, I don't understand what the OP means and I suspect he doesn't either. If he can express this thought in terms of observables, it might be discussable, but as it is it's words words words. Like "a weath of pretty little flowers which smell bad."
 
Vanadium 50 said:
But a photon is also a quantum particle, not a classical wave, and is only longitudinal.
Did you mean to say "is only transverse"?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen
Either. Depends on if you are talking spin or electric field direction. Which emphasizes the OPs confusion the description of a thing is not the same as the thing.
 
Martyn Arthur said:
the nature of a wave fired from an electron gun is transverse in transit
Where did you read this? Can you give us a link or reference so we can see where you're "coming from" on this?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Vanadium 50 said:
Either. Depends on if you are talking spin or electric field direction.
That's a good point, I was thinking only classically. Massless photons or gravitons do indeed always have longitudinal spin with transverse polarization. For massive electrons it seems polarization must refer to spin-up or spin-down with respect to some external magnetic field B. A e-beam is then "polarized" to the extent it consists of unequal numbers of electrons with up vs. down spins. If the B-field happens to be perpendicular to the beam propagation direction, might this then constitute "transverse electron polarization"?
 
PeroK said:
An electron is a quantum particle. It's not a classical wave, and neither transverse nor longitudinal.
Of course you can have polarized electrons, i.e., electrons with their spin in a given direction.
 
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
Either. Depends on if you are talking spin or electric field direction. Which emphasizes the OPs confusion the description of a thing is not the same as the thing.
A photon can only be "transverse". A photon as a massless spin-1 particle, has only two polarization-degrees of freedom. The natural choice is helicity, i.e., the projection of total angular momentum to the direction of the momentum, and the helicity can only take the values ##\pm 1##. That's a subtlety of massless particles with spin. It has always only two helicity states ##\pm s## (with ##s \in \{1/2,1,3/2,\ldots \}##).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hyperfine
  • #11
vanhees71 said:
A photon can only be "transverse".
A photon's electric field can only be "transverse". A photon's spin can only be "longitudunal."

(Convention is to talk about fields, trhough). What I tried to bring up, and obviously failed to do well, is that this is a description that depends on definition. You tell me the definition you use, and I'll tell you what names the physics requires.

When making a physical prediction, of course we get the same answer no matter which words we use. This is why I think the OP's question "which words do we use?" is ill=posed.
 
  • #12
Define what you mean by spin then. It's not possible to split the total angular momentum into spin and orbit parts in a gauge-invariant way!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LittleSchwinger
  • #13
As I recall, the electron has corpuscular-wave dualism! It behaves both like a wave and like a particle! There are many interesting things in the world))) So many discoveries are yet to come)))
 
  • #14
BillyDoster said:
As I recall, the electron has corpuscular-wave dualism! It behaves both like a wave and like a particle! There are many interesting things in the world))) So many discoveries are yet to come)))
QM explained that one!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K