hi. i was able to prove the trapezoidal rule and simpsons rule. (basically i used matrices to determine the coefficients m and b for mx+b when proving the trapezoidal rule and a,b,c for ax^2+bx+c such that the points coincide, then i integrated the approximating polynomial) the amount of number-crunching and expanding products of linear terms was probably the most work ive ever done, but i was amazed to see terms cancel out to yeild vastly simplified formulas. but i was wondering, suppose i approximated each step with suppose, a cubic equation. i know how to do this, but after setting up the 4x4 matrix i quickly realized that this would be extremely mundane due to all the algebraic manipulations. so before i try deriving a numerical method that uses cubics to approximate the curve pieces, i wanna know whether it will simplify. will it simplify?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Trapezoidal, simpsons rule, and higher order approximations

Loading...

Similar Threads - Trapezoidal simpsons rule | Date |
---|---|

B Trapezoidal Rule , number of segments | Feb 16, 2016 |

Trapezoidal Integral of Discrete Values | Apr 5, 2014 |

The trapezoidal rule | Jan 2, 2014 |

Error of Simpson's, Trapezoid, etc. Rules | Nov 11, 2013 |

Trapezoidal motion/kinematics calculations - solving for slewing velocity | Nov 4, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**