Traveling Wavefunction: Differentiating & Relating $\Psi$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spylock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on differentiating the traveling wavefunction $\Psi(x-ut,t)$ and relating it to $\Psi(x,t)$ using the Schrödinger equation. Key equations include the time derivative $\frac{\partial\Phi(x,t)}{\partial t}$ and the second spatial derivative $\frac{\partial^2\Phi(x,t)}{\partial x^2}$. Corrections were provided for the exponent in the wavefunction and the relationship between variables, specifically $u=\frac{\omega}{k}$. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying differentiation rules in the context of wavefunctions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differentiation in wave mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of complex exponentials in wavefunctions
  • Basic concepts of wave propagation and group velocity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schrödinger equation in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of wavefunction normalization
  • Explore the concept of group velocity and phase velocity in wave mechanics
  • Investigate the mathematical properties of complex functions in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying quantum mechanics, wave phenomena, and mathematical physics. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of wavefunctions and their applications in quantum theory.

Spylock
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hi, I want to check how to show ##\Phi(x,t)## is a solution to TDSE given that ##\Psi(x,t)## is a solution to TDSE. Note that there is no potential.
Relevant Equations
$$\Phi(x,t)=\Psi(x-ut,t)e^{i(k(x-\omega t)}$$
I am not sure whether I have differentiated correctly
$$\frac{\partial\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial t}=-u\frac{\partial\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial(x-ut)}+\frac{\partial\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial t}$$

and
$$\frac{\partial^2\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial x^2}=\frac{\partial^2\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial(x-ut)^2}$$

So, we have
$$\frac{\partial\Phi(x,t)}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial t}e^{i(kx-\omega t)}-i\omega\Psi(x-ut,t)e^{i(kx-\omega t)}$$
$$\frac{\partial^2\Phi(x,t)}{\partial x^2}=\frac{\partial^2\Psi(x-ut,t)}{\partial x^2}e^{i(kx-\omega t)}-k^2\Psi(x-ut,t)e^{i(kx-\omega t)}+2ik\Psi(x-ut,t)e^{i(kx-\omega t}$$

Also, how do I relate \Psi(x,t) with \Psi(x-ut,t) given that
$$i\hbar\frac{\partial\Psi(x,t)}{\partial t}=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2\Psi(x,t)}{\partial x^2}$$

Thank you for advice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation needs to read: ## \frac{d \Psi(y,t)}{dt}=(\frac{\partial{\Psi(y,t)}}{\partial{y}})_t(\frac{\partial{y}}{\partial{t}})_x+(\frac{\partial{\Psi(y,t)}}{\partial{t}})_y ##, where ## y=x-ut ##.
Also, in the first line, your exponent needs to read ## kx-\omega t ##. (You have a parenthesis in the wrong place). ## u=\frac{\omega}{k} ##.
With the corrections I gave you above, you should be able to finish it up.
 
Also, be careful when taking ## (\frac{\partial{\Phi(x,t)}}{\partial{t}})_x ##. It basically means taking ## \frac{d}{dt} ## of ## \Psi(x-ut)e^{i(kx-\omega t)} ##, but treating ## x ## as a constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K