Triangle Inequality in 'Linear Algebra Done Right'

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Triangle Inequality as presented in "Linear Algebra Done Right," specifically addressing the proof on page 105 of the 2nd edition. The user questions the transition from inequality 6.11 to equality under the condition that one vector is a scalar multiple of the other. The key equation, 2Re ≤ 2||, is highlighted, with the user seeking clarification on how equality is achieved when u and v are scalar multiples. The resolution involves substituting v = αu and analyzing the resulting expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex inner products
  • Familiarity with the Triangle Inequality in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of scalar multiplication in vector spaces
  • Basic concepts of real and imaginary components in complex numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Triangle Inequality in "Linear Algebra Done Right" (2nd edition)
  • Learn about complex inner product properties and their implications
  • Explore scalar multiplication and its effects on vector norms
  • Investigate the relationship between real and imaginary parts in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of complex inner products and the Triangle Inequality.

TheOldHag
Messages
44
Reaction score
3
I'm stuck on one aspect of the proof on page 105 of the 2nd edition. Equation 6.13 is necessary for the inequality to be an equality as it says but they never seem to account for inequality 6.11. Specifically, I don't see how this satisfies 2 Re<u,v> = 2 |<u,v>|

Thanks for any guidance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you explain your question in a way that doesn't require having the book?
 
It's not an equality; it is ≤.

2Re< u, v > ≤ 2|<u, v>|
 
Last edited:
They gave as a condition for this to be an equality that u would be a scalar multiple of v or else v a scalar multiple of u. But they never showed how 2 Re <u,v> would be equal to 2 | <u,v> | in that case.
 
TheOldHag said:
They gave as a condition for this to be an equality that u would be a scalar multiple of v or else v a scalar multiple of u. But they never showed how 2 Re <u,v> would be equal to 2 | <u,v> | in that case.

Just plug in ##\mathbf{v}=\alpha \mathbf{u}## and see what happens.
 
I've given that a try and still have not been able to get it. I'm sure there is some simple connection I'm missing. I'm starting with

|<u, au>| =
| a*u1*comp(u1) + a*u2*comp(u2) + ... + a*uN*comp(uN) | =
| a |u1|^2 + a |u2|^2 + ... + a |uN|^2 |

And from here I have no idea where that is taking me. Similar result form the other side.
 
I think I got it but still a bit confused. This assumes a and hence complex conjugate of a are real numbers and hence the imaginary part in the equations below ends up being zero and dropping off. So is the case that this is an equality only if one vector is a real scalar multiple of the other?

|&lt;u, au&gt;| =
\sqrt{(Re &lt;u, au&gt;)^{2} + (Im &lt;u, au&gt;)^{2}} =
\sqrt{(Re \overline{a} &lt;u, u&gt;)^{2} + (Im \overline{a} &lt;u, u&gt;)^{2}} =
\sqrt{(Re \overline{a} \left\|u\right\|^{2})^{2} + (Im \overline{a} \left\|u\right\|^{2})^{2}} =
\sqrt{(Re \overline{a} \left\|u\right\|^{2})^{2}} =
Re \overline{a} \left\|u\right\|^{2} =
Re &lt;u, au&gt;
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K