Tricky Integration in Rocket-Momentum Derivation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mar2194
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration involved in the derivation of rocket momentum, particularly focusing on the changing mass of the rocket and the velocity of the exhausted fuel. Participants explore the mathematical techniques related to integration and the properties of logarithms as they pertain to this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a derivation involving the momentum of a rocket, leading to an integration step that they find confusing.
  • The participant questions why the integration results in a natural logarithm of the form ln(minitial/m) instead of ln(m), indicating a discrepancy in their understanding of the limits of integration.
  • Another participant explains the property of logarithms and suggests considering the limits of integration to clarify the results.
  • There is a mention of the conceptual understanding that the rocket's mass decreases as it burns fuel, which is relevant to the integration limits.
  • A later reply corrects the LaTeX tags used for formatting mathematical expressions in the forum.
  • One participant expresses gratitude for the clarification and confirms that understanding the limits resolves their confusion regarding the integration result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mathematical properties of logarithms and the need to consider integration limits, but there remains some uncertainty regarding the specific integration steps and results. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the interpretation of the integration process.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the importance of understanding integration limits and properties of logarithms in the context of changing mass in rocket momentum derivations. There are unresolved aspects regarding the integration steps that participants are working through.

mar2194
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was going through a fairly simple proof about rockets/momentum, taking into account the changing mass of the rocket as well as the velocity of the exhausted fuel. I was getting towards the end of it having felt like I understood it well, until I got to this point (this is from a Junior year course in Mechanics btw):

After assuming that there are no external forces on the rocket (so that we can say dP=0):
mdv=-dmvexhaust

Okay, this step makes perfect sense. Then the proof goes on to say (after separating variables):

dv=vexhaust(dm/m) Okay, again, this makes perfect sense.

But after this there is an integration that I don't understand (it's been a while since I've taken Calculus... so I'm not sure what I missed). The author then integrates both sides and obtains:

v-vinitial=vexhaustln(minitial/m)

Why is the natural log on the right hand side ln(minitial/m)? When I did the integration I got:
v+vinitial=vexhaustln(m).

Similar results, but clearly a big difference.

I didn't post this in the homework section because it's not homework (I'm on medical leave from university and am brushing up on material by going through the text before I have to return and take my final exam in Mechanics... yay! :wink:) and I felt it was more of a mathematical question about integration techniques/reasoning. There might be something conceptual that I'm not following. I also haven't posted here in a while but probably will use these boards a lot in the next few months as I prepare to return to school. I see other posts have used LaTeX but I don't know how to implement it if anyone wants to chime in on how to (i.e. what is the tag I have to put around my LaTeX code?).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mar2194,


First recall that a property of the natural logarithm is --> ln(a/b) = ln(a) - ln(b) and also when you integrate, say, f(x) = dv, (of which F(x) = v) you will have limits to compute for a definite integral. The integral of dv with limits A to B is v(B) - v(A).

Also think of what's being explained in a conceptual sense. The rocket's final mass will be less than its initial mass. This is because it burns fuel as it increases in speed (the fuel will a part of the rocket's mass). So in other words, the mass of the rocket decreases and its velocity increases. Use these notions to evaluate your limits of m and v and see what you get.

Follow this link for a description of LaTeX:

https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3216
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LaTeX description in the blog is incorrect - tags should take form [noparse][tеx][/tеx][/noparse] and [noparse][itеx][/itеx][/noparse].
 
Parmenides said:
mar2194,


First recall that a property of the natural logarithm is --> ln(a/b) = ln(a) - ln(b) and also when you integrate, say, f(x) = dv, (of which F(x) = v) you will have limits to compute for a definite integral. The integral of dv with limits A to B is v(B) - v(A).

Also think of what's being explained in a conceptual sense. The rocket's final mass will be less than its initial mass. This is because it burns fuel as it increases in speed (the fuel will a part of the rocket's mass). So in other words, the mass of the rocket decreases and its velocity increases. Use these notions to evaluate your limits of m and v and see what you get.

Follow this link for a description of LaTeX:

https://www.physicsforums.com/blog.php?b=3216

Thanks! So the integration is from m to m initial, correct? That gives me the result the textbook has. Thanks a bunch! I knew it was simple, but it's literally been 2 years since I've taken Calculus.
~mar2194~
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K