Trig Functions Periodicity: Which Function is Not Periodic?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying which of several trigonometric functions is not periodic. The functions in question include combinations of sine, cosine, and tangent with varying arguments, prompting participants to explore the nature of periodicity in trigonometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the periodicity of various trigonometric functions and suggest graphing as a method to analyze them. There are questions about the definitions of periodicity and the arguments of the functions involved. Some participants express discomfort with graphing and seek alternative methods for determining periodicity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different aspects of periodicity. Some have suggested examining the arguments of the functions to identify differences, while others have provided insights into the periods of specific functions. There is a lack of consensus on the best approach, but several productive lines of inquiry are being pursued.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of trigonometric functions and their periodic properties, with some expressing uncertainty about graphing and the implications of periodicity. The original problem statement is reiterated multiple times, indicating a focus on understanding rather than solving.

  • #61
PeterO said:
The easiest ones to recognise as non-periodic are those where the argument is an indice.

In sin (x) , sin is the function, x is the argument

sin (x^2) is not periodic [remember x^2 is an indice]

Would it be okay to simply say if the argument is nonlinear, it won't be periodic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
Bohrok said:
Would it be okay to simply say if the argument is nonlinear, it won't be periodic?

Nope.
Consider for instance sin(sin x) which is periodic.
 
  • #63
I like Serena said:
Nope.
Consider for instance sin(sin x) which is periodic.

Touché
I was thinking only of arguments where x was raised to something like a real exponent.
Is it correct to say that the composition of two periodic functions is also periodic? I tried several on WolframAlpha and they were periodic.
 
  • #64
Pranav-Arora said:
(btw, in a few days (maybe 27th august), a test is going to be conducted in my classes, would you be willing to tell me some short tricks for solving trigonometry questions and other topics. (i will ask other topics to my teacher which are included in the syllabus tomorrow) :smile:)[/size]

Hmm, I don't really have a list of tricks ready.
As it is, I have been teaching you tricks during this thread and your previous threads. :biggrin:

I can tell you that your trigonometry is still a bit "shaky" as opposed to for instance your logarithms! :smile:
Most important for trigonometry IMHO is understanding and application of the unit circle.
And you would need a list of the trigonometric identities that are not immediately obvious from the unit circle.

There are other topics that I haven't seen any threads of yet (I think).
Like solving equations, or sets of equations.
And like differentiation and integration.
And like sequences, series, and recurrence relations.
Vectors, dot products, and matrices.

Are you supposed to know those as well?
 
  • #65
Bohrok said:
Touché
I was thinking only of arguments where x was raised to something like a real exponent.
Is it correct to say that the composition of two periodic functions is also periodic? I tried several on WolframAlpha and they were periodic.

What you need is that you can add some constant to x and when you substitute it, you get the same values.
That is you need a constant T, such that for every x you have: f(x) = f(x+T)

As for compositions of periodic functions, try:
sin(x) + 2 sin(e x)
which is not periodic.
 
  • #66
I like Serena said:
Hmm, I don't really have a list of tricks ready.
As it is, I have been teaching you tricks during this thread and your previous threads. :biggrin:

I can tell you that your trigonometry is still a bit "shaky" as opposed to for instance your logarithms! :smile:
Most important for trigonometry IMHO is understanding and application of the unit circle.
And you would need a list of the trigonometric identities that are not immediately obvious from the unit circle.

There are other topics that I haven't seen any threads of yet (I think).
Like solving equations, or sets of equations.
And like differentiation and integration.
And like sequences, series, and recurrence relations.
Vectors, dot products, and matrices.

Are you supposed to know those as well?

Thank you for your concern ILS! :smile:
Because of especially you and the other members here like SammyS, PeterO, eumyang, Borek (I don't see him on the board now-a-days) i have learned a lot.

I don't understand what do you mean by sets of equation?

Differentiation and integration haven't been really started in my course. Yet we have been given some basic formulas for them. We are done with the chain rule of differentiation. We have been told some basic things like the derivative of displacement is velocity and integrating velocity gives displacement. My teacher said that these things would be taken up next year in much more detail. But i try to learn these using MIT lectures, sadly i get very less time for them. :frown:

In my classes, we are done with sequence and series. I try to go back to them because i am sure that i have loads of doubts in it. Sorry but we aren't thought anything like "recurrence relations."

Vectors is really easy for me and my teacher has made it so easy for us that we feel like that's the most easiest topic in physics. I rarely get doubts, and if doubts occur, my physics teacher explains it. :smile:

Nope :)
we haven't started with matrices.
 
  • #67
Pranav-Arora said:
Thank you for your concern ILS! :smile:
Because of especially you and the other members here like SammyS, PeterO, eumyang, Borek (I don't see him on the board now-a-days) i have learned a lot.

Thanks! :blushing:

Last I heard, Borek was on a vacation, but it has indeed been quite a while now.


Pranav-Arora said:
I don't understand what do you mean by sets of equation?

Oh, that's like:

Suppose the sum of the ages of Amy and Bria is 28, and the product of their ages is 195, what are their respective ages?
 
  • #68
I like Serena said:
Thanks! :blushing:

Last I heard, Borek was on a vacation, but it has indeed been quite a while now.

Your welcome! :smile:

I like Serena said:
Oh, that's like:

Suppose the sum of the ages of Amy and Bria is 28, and the product of their ages is 195, what are their respective ages?

These type of questions i used to do in past. :wink:
 
  • #69
I like Serena said:
What you need is that you can add some constant to x and when you substitute it, you get the same values.
That is you need a constant T, such that for every x you have: f(x) = f(x+T)

As for compositions of periodic functions, try:
sin(x) + 2 sin(e x)
which is not periodic.

That's a sum of periodic functions; I meant like (f o g)(x), such as sin(sin(x)) and cos(tan(x))
 
  • #70
Bohrok said:
That's a sum of periodic functions; I meant like (f o g)(x), such as sin(sin(x)) and cos(tan(x))

Oh, all right. :wink:
A little sharper is that if each inner function which is taken from x is periodic, the result will be periodic.
Note that if there is more than one function that is taken from x, they all need to be periodic and the ratio of their periods must be a rational number.
 
  • #71
I like Serena said:
What you need is that you can add some constant to x and when you substitute it, you get the same values.
That is you need a constant T, such that for every x you have: f(x) = f(x+T)

As for compositions of periodic functions, try:
sin(x) + 2 sin(e x)
which is not periodic.

What's this "sin(e x)"?

Bohrok said:
That's a sum of periodic functions; I meant like (f o g)(x), such as sin(sin(x)) and cos(tan(x))

And what's this "(f o g)(x)"?
 
  • #72
Pranav-Arora said:
What's this "sin(e x)"?

"e" is Euler's number (2.71828), which is the base of the natural logarithm.
I used it because it's an irrational number other than pi.
In particular the ratio between e and pi cannot be written as the ratio of 2 whole numbers.
Pranav-Arora said:
And what's this "(f o g)(x)"?

It's math notation for f(g(x)). It's called "function composition" or "f applied to the result of g".
 
  • #73
I like Serena said:
"e" is Euler's number (2.71828), which is the base of the natural logarithm.
I used it because it's an irrational number other than pi.
In particular the ratio between e and pi cannot be written as the ratio of 2 whole numbers.

Is x is raised to the power of e in sin(e x) or is x multiplied to e?

I like Serena said:
It's math notation for f(g(x)). It's called "function composition" or "f applied to the result of g".
75px-Puzzled.svg.png

Never came across that.
 
  • #74
Pranav-Arora said:
Is x is raised to the power of e in sin(e x) or is x multiplied to e?

What is the period in each case?
Pranav-Arora said:
75px-Puzzled.svg.png

Never came across that.

You just did! And I expect it will not be the last time. :smile:
 
  • #75
I like Serena said:
What is the period in each case?

If its sin(ex) then the period is \frac{2\pi}{e}. (Found it by applying the sin (nx) rule)
If it is sin(ex), then it's not periodic since the argument is non linear.
Right..?
 
  • #76
Pranav-Arora said:
If its sin(ex) then the period is \frac{2\pi}{e}. (Found it by applying the sin (nx) rule)
If it is sin(ex), then it's not periodic since the argument is non linear.
Right..?

Right! :smile:

Since I stated it was periodic, it would have to be the first form.
(And anyway, I wouldn't write down an ambiguous expression. :wink:)
 
  • #77
I like Serena said:
Right! :smile:

Since I stated it was periodic, it would have to be the first form.
(And anyway, I wouldn't write down an ambiguous expression. :wink:)


Do you have some more (conceptual)questions for periodicity? :smile:
 
  • #78
Pranav-Arora said:
Do you have some more (conceptual)questions for periodicity? :smile:

No. Don't you have any?
41px-Smiley_green_alien_cool.svg.png
 
  • #79
I like Serena said:
No. Don't you have any?
41px-Smiley_green_alien_cool.svg.png

No. :smile:
(You found out the website from where i am using these emoticons. :biggrin:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K