Trigonometric function expanded in spherical harmonics

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 7K views
M_1
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
Is it possible to express (cos([itex]\theta[/itex])sin([itex]\theta[/itex]))^2 in terms of spherical harmonics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but it depends on what you want. For instance,
$$
-\frac{32 \pi^2}{9} Y_1^{-1} Y_1^1 \left(Y_1^0\right)^2 = \cos^2 \theta \sin^2 \theta
$$
But if you require a result in terms of a sum of spherical harmonics, then this requires more work.
 
Hi!
Thanks! Yes but then the next question is if it is possible to express 1/4 (sin(2θ)))^2 in terms of spherical harmonics.

For example we can write cos2(θ)=1/3(4*[itex]\sqrt{\pi /5}[/itex]Y20+1),
but is such an expansion possible also for 1/4 (sin(2θ)))^2? I need an a linear expansion in only spherical harmonics (not combined with trigonometric functions).
 
M_1 said:
I need an a linear expansion in only spherical harmonics (not combined with trigonometric functions).
Telling us what you need this for will help us help you.
 
Hi DrClaude,
Thanks! But as you correctly guessed I need a sum of spherical harmonics. I would be glad to do the work but I don't know how to start and more scaringly I'm not sure if it is possible. That's why I first would like to find out if it is possible.
 
Hi DrClaude,
I'm trying do calculate the exact solution for the vibrational energy of an inviscid droplet with a predetermined surface tension, radius, and amplitude.

In order to do so I need to solve the integral
[itex]\int[/itex]r5sin([itex]\theta[/itex])cos([itex]\theta[/itex])sin([itex]\theta[/itex])d[itex]\theta[/itex]d[itex]\varphi[/itex] where
r=r0(1+[itex]\alpha[/itex]Y20sin([itex]\varpi[/itex]t))
where [itex]\alpha[/itex] is the relative amplitude.

I try do use the nice methodology of Baxansky and Kiryati
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2006.06.001
but I get stuck on this issue.

There can be no [itex]\varphi[/itex]-dependence.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've got it. The answer is
$$
\frac{4}{15} \sqrt{\pi } Y_0^0(\theta ,\phi )+\frac{4}{21} \sqrt{\frac{\pi }{5}} Y_2^0(\theta ,\phi )-\frac{16}{105} \sqrt{\pi } Y_4^0(\theta ,\phi )
$$
You can check it for yourself in WolframAlpha. Look at the "Alternate forms".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Excellent! Problem solved. Many thanks DrClaude!