MHB Trigonometric Identity Questions

suzy1231
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Your help will be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!1. The expression \(\sin\pi\) is equal to \(0\), while the expression $\frac{1}{\csc\pi}$ is undefined. Why is $\sin\theta=\frac{1}{\csc\theta}$ still an identity?

2. Prove $\cos(\theta + \frac{\pi}{2})= -\sin\theta$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
suzy123 said:
2. Prove $\cos(\theta + \frac{\pi}{2})= -\sin\theta$

Use the addition formula together with the values from the unit circle $$\cos(A+B) = \cos(A)\cos(B) - \sin(A)\sin(B)$$
 
Welcome to MHB, suzy123! :)

suzy123 said:
Your help will be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!1. The expression \(\sin\pi\) is equal to \(0\), while the expression $\frac{1}{\csc\pi}$ is undefined. Why is $\sin\theta=\frac{1}{\csc\theta}$ still an identity?

It's an identity when both are defined.
And if you treat $\csc\pi$ as $\infty$ it even holds there.
 
I like Serena said:
Welcome to MHB, suzy123! :)
It's an identity when both are defined.
And if you treat $\csc\pi$ as $\infty$ it even holds there.
An excellent point. Also, another way of looking at both is by considering limiting values:$$\lim_{x \to \pi}\sin x=0$$

$$\lim_{x \to \pi}\csc x = \lim_{x \to \pi}\frac{1}{\sin x}=\frac{1}{ \lim_{x \to \pi}\sin x } = \lim_{z \to 0 }\frac{1}{z} \to \frac{1}{0} \to \infty$$Similarly, you could use the composite angle formula I Like Serena gave above,

$$\sin (x \pm y)= \sin x \cos y \pm \cos x \sin y$$

and consider the limits$$\sin \pi = \lim_{x \to \pi}\sin x= \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\sin (\pi \pm \epsilon) \to 0$$and$$\csc \pi = \lim_{x \to \pi}\csc x= \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{1}{\sin (\pi \pm \epsilon)} \to \infty$$
 
Prove that the function:

$f(\theta) = \sin\theta\csc\theta$

has removable discontinuities at $k\pi,\ k \in \Bbb Z$.

It is, by and large, problematic to simply say:

$\infty = \frac{1}{0}$ because such an assignment does not obey the algebraic rules of the real numbers (in particular, the cancellation law:

$ac = bc \implies a = b$ when $c \neq 0$

breaks down).

While it *is* possible to extend the real numbers in various ways to include the notion of infinity, it is usually preferable to phrase statements about infinity in ways that do not mention infinity itself such as:

instead of:

$\displaystyle \lim_{x \to a} f(x) = \infty$

we say:

for any $N > 0$, there is some $\delta > 0$ such that for all $0 < |x - a| < \delta$, we have $f(x) > N$.

This is a fancy way of saying: $f$ increases without bound near $a$. Note it does not mention infinity, nor does it say what (if any) value we should ascribe to $f(a)$.

As others have mentioned, the cosecant function is undefined at certain points. If one is asked to evaluate cosecant at such a point, one ought to politely refuse.
 
Deveno said:
If one is asked to evaluate cosecant at such a point, one ought to politely refuse.

Genius! :cool:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top