MHB Trigonometric inequality with pi

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the trigonometric inequality $$ \sin{(\pi x)}>\cos{(\pi \sqrt{x})} $$ and explores various approaches to simplify it. Initial attempts to manipulate the inequality using sine and cosine properties were met with challenges, particularly due to the presence of the square root. The conversation shifts to analyzing the inequality under different quadrant assumptions, leading to specific ranges for x, such as $$ 0 \leq x \leq \frac{1}{4} $$ and $$ \frac{1}{2} \leq x \leq 1 $$. The periodicity of the sine function is also raised as a concern, suggesting that the solutions may not be exhaustive without considering additional periodic terms. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexity of the inequality and the need for careful quadrant analysis.
karseme
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
$$ \sin{(\pi x)}>\cos{(\pi \sqrt{x})} $$

I don't know how to solve this. I would really appreciate some help.
I tried to do something, but didn't get anything.

If I move cos to the left side, I can't apply formulas for sum. Since arguments of sin and cos have $$ \pi $$, I think there is no way I can somehow make it simpler by using addition formulas. If I could somehow get rid of that square root, but how?! I know that $$ x=(\sqrt{x})^2 $$, but what's use of that when I don't see how to get rid of that power of 2. I tried squaring everything and doing something, but I didn't get anything from that. I don't know how to proceed. I don't see there are any formulas which I could use to make this simpler.

Must solve this somehow, would appreciate your help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karseme said:
$$ \sin{(\pi x)}>\cos{(\pi \sqrt{x})} $$

I don't know how to solve this. I would really appreciate some help.
I tried to do something, but didn't get anything.

If I move cos to the left side, I can't apply formulas for sum. Since arguments of sin and cos have $$ \pi $$, I think there is no way I can somehow make it simpler by using addition formulas. If I could somehow get rid of that square root, but how?! I know that $$ x=(\sqrt{x})^2 $$, but what's use of that when I don't see how to get rid of that power of 2. I tried squaring everything and doing something, but I didn't get anything from that. I don't know how to proceed. I don't see there are any formulas which I could use to make this simpler.

Must solve this somehow, would appreciate your help.

Hi karseme! ;)

Suppose we assume that both angles are in the first quadrant.
That is, $0\le \pi x \le \frac\pi 2$ and $0\le \pi \sqrt x \le \frac\pi 2$.
So $0\le x \le \frac 14$.

Then:
$$\sin{(\pi x)}>\sin{(\frac\pi 2 - \pi \sqrt{x})}$$
Since the sine is increasing in the first quadrant, we get:
$$\pi x>\frac\pi 2 - \pi \sqrt{x}$$
It follows that:
$$\sqrt x > \frac 12 (\sqrt 3 - 1)$$
And since $\sqrt{}$ is increasing, we find:
$$\frac 12 (2-\sqrt 3) < x \le \frac 14$$

We can continue with considering cases if the angles are in other quadrants.
 
Thank you very much. :) It was very helpful.
 
So, if we assume that both angles are in the second quadrant, then the following must be true:
$$ \dfrac{\pi}{2} \leq \pi x \leq \pi \qquad \land \qquad \dfrac{\pi}{2} \leq \pi \sqrt{x} \leq \pi \, \implies \dfrac{1}{2} \leq x \leq 1 $$

Since $$ \pi \sqrt{x} $$ is in the second quadrant we have:

$$ cos{(\pi \sqrt{x})}=-\cos{(\pi-\pi \sqrt{x})}=-\sin{(\dfrac{\pi}{2} + \pi - \pi \sqrt{x})}=-\sin{(\dfrac{3\pi}{2}- \pi \sqrt{x})}=\sin{(\pi \sqrt{x}-\dfrac{3\pi}{2})} $$

So,

$$ \sin{(\pi x)} > \sin{(\pi \sqrt{x}-\dfrac{3\pi}{2})} $$

Since sine is decreasing in the second quadrant then we have:

$$ \pi x < \pi \sqrt{x}-\dfrac{3\pi}{2} $$

This quadratic inequality does not have solution(for t=\sqrt{x}).

Is this good? But, when I solve the given inequality for $$ \dfrac{1}{2} \leq x \leq 1 $$ it is true.

So, those are the solutions...is it any good?

But what about periodicity of sine? then those can't be the only solutions?
 
karseme said:
So, if we assume that both angles are in the second quadrant, then the following must be true:
$$ \dfrac{\pi}{2} \leq \pi x \leq \pi \qquad \land \qquad \dfrac{\pi}{2} \leq \pi \sqrt{x} \leq \pi \, \implies \dfrac{1}{2} \leq x \leq 1 $$

Since $$ \pi \sqrt{x} $$ is in the second quadrant we have:

$$ cos{(\pi \sqrt{x})}=-\cos{(\pi-\pi \sqrt{x})}=-\sin{(\dfrac{\pi}{2} + \pi - \pi \sqrt{x})}=-\sin{(\dfrac{3\pi}{2}- \pi \sqrt{x})}=\sin{(\pi \sqrt{x}-\dfrac{3\pi}{2})} $$

So,

$$ \sin{(\pi x)} > \sin{(\pi \sqrt{x}-\dfrac{3\pi}{2})} $$

Since sine is decreasing in the second quadrant then we have:

$$ \pi x < \pi \sqrt{x}-\dfrac{3\pi}{2} $$

This quadratic inequality does not have solution(for t=\sqrt{x}).

Is this good? But, when I solve the given inequality for $$ \dfrac{1}{2} \leq x \leq 1 $$ it is true.

So, those are the solutions...is it any good?

But what about periodicity of sine? then those can't be the only solutions?

I'm afraid we have to consider $\pi x$ to be in any quadrant and $\pi\sqrt x$ to be in the same or any other quadrant.
Furthermore, we have to consider that they may have an additional $2k\pi$ added to them that can be different for each of them. (Sweating)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top