Trouble Understanding Indexed Union of Lines in the Plane

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MotoPayton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lines Plane Union
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of indexed unions of lines in the plane, specifically addressing the confusion between indexed unions and intersections. The indexed union of sets I_n, defined as the lines y=n for n=0, 1, 2, does not yield an empty set, as each line contains all points along its respective y-value. The key takeaway is that indexed unions consist of distinct lines, each containing their own points, rather than overlapping points, which is a characteristic of intersections.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of indexed unions in set theory
  • Familiarity with the concept of lines in a Cartesian plane
  • Knowledge of set operations, particularly union and intersection
  • Basic comprehension of mathematical notation and definitions in R²
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of indexed unions in set theory
  • Explore the differences between union and intersection of sets
  • Learn about the representation of lines in the Cartesian plane
  • Investigate the implications of subsets in R²
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, and students seeking clarity on set theory concepts, particularly those involving indexed unions and their applications in geometry.

MotoPayton
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble understanding how the indexed union of ln in the first picture is equal to a subset of the plane; an element of it is a point on one of the lines. If I were to choose say 0 1 2 then the indexed union should be y=0 union y=1 union y=2. These lines would have no points in common so the total indexed union should be the empty set. I understand the second second set, it is the indexed union giving me trouble. Sorry if the pictures are blurry my phone isn't the greatest.

0306132054a.jpg


http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt113/KtmPayton/0306132054.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MotoPayton said:
These lines would have no points in common so the total indexed union should be the empty set.


You didn't include the part of the text where I_n is defined.

Why would having points in common be relevant to a union of sets? Are you thinking of an intersection of sets instead?
 
The definition of In is on the next link. In is a subset of R2 and is the line of equation y=n.
I have to admit for some reason I was stuck on thinking this was an intersection. Thinking about it some more I have realized that the individual sets of the indexed union each contain a line. Those particular sets contain all the points that make up the line.
That is how it differs from the other one where the individual set contains all the different lines. Pretty sure I have it now. Thanks for helping.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K