Trouble with Complex Exponentials

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewtonianAlch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that if Im(z) ≥ 0, then |e^(i(x+iy))| ≤ 1. Participants demonstrate that the modulus of the expression simplifies to e^(-y), confirming that e^(-y) is maximized at y = 0, thus satisfying the inequality. Additionally, they explore the deduction involving the fraction e^(-Im(x+iy)) / |(x+iy)^4 + 1|, establishing that it is bounded by (R^4 - 1)^(-1) for z on the semi-circle defined by |z| = R and Im(z) ≥ 0. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding complex exponentials and their properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Understanding of exponential functions in the complex plane
  • Knowledge of modulus and absolute value in complex numbers
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities related to complex exponentials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of complex exponentials and their moduli
  • Learn about the Cauchy-Riemann equations and their implications in complex analysis
  • Explore the concept of contour integration in complex analysis
  • Investigate the behavior of functions on semi-circular contours in the complex plane
USEFUL FOR

Students of complex analysis, mathematicians working with complex functions, and anyone interested in the properties of complex exponentials and their applications in mathematical proofs.

NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that if Im(z) ≥ 0, then |[itex]{{\rm e}^{i \left( x+iy \right) }}[/itex]| ≤ 1.

Let R > 1 be a real constant

Now deduce that [itex]{\frac {{{\rm e}^{-{\it Im} \left( x+iy \right) }}}{ \left| \left( x+<br /> iy \right) ^{4}+1 \right| }}[/itex] ≤ [itex]\left( {R}^{4}-1 \right) ^{-1}[/itex] for z on the semi-circle {z [itex]\in[/itex] ℂ: |z| = R, Im(z) ≥ 0}

The Attempt at a Solution



The imaginary part of z ≥ 0 is just y ≥ 0.

Multiplying the exponential through, you get, [itex]{{\rm e}^{ix-y}}[/itex].

I realize that taking the modulus of this will make the e^ix disappear, leaving only e^-y, which clearly shows then as y ≥ 0:

e^-y ≤ 1

I'm not too sure how to get the modulus of that exponential.

N.B: The modulus applies to the entire fraction, I cannot seem to get the modulus including the entire fraction for some reason, it's just appearing on the denominator
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried a few methods, with this I got what looked correct, but I wasn't really sure of what I was doing.

[itex]{{\rm e}^{ix}}{{\rm e}^{-y}}[/itex]

[itex] {{\rm e}^{-y}} \left( \cos \left( x \right) +i\sin \left( x \right) <br /> \right) [/itex]

Taking the absolute value of that:

Square Root of [itex][\left( {{\rm e}^{-y}} \right) ^{2} \left( \cos \left( x \right) <br /> \right) ^{2}+ \left( {{\rm e}^{-y}} \right) ^{2} \left( \sin \left( x<br /> \right) \right) ^{2}][/itex]

Square Root of [itex][{{\rm e}^{-2\,y}}*(1)][/itex]

Which is [itex]{{\rm e}^{-y}}<br /> [/itex]

Voila? So now we can see that as y increases the value of e^-y is going to decrease, with its maximum value when y = 0 as per I am (z).

Edit: Forgot to add the second part of the question earlier, just added it in, not sure on how to proceed with that part.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K