Trouble with DIY Quantum Eraser Experiment?

  • Context: Misc. 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jimjones
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diy Eraser
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on challenges faced while conducting a DIY Quantum Eraser (QE) experiment. The user successfully achieves an interference pattern with a double slit experiment using a laser pointer but encounters issues with the QE experiment, resulting in a smudged pattern. Key factors identified include the quality of the laser pointer and the effectiveness of cheap cardboard polarizers. The discussion emphasizes the importance of testing polarizers for proper orientation and alignment to ensure accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically wave-particle duality.
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment and its implications in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of polarizing filters and their operational characteristics.
  • Basic experimental setup skills, including alignment and calibration of optical components.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and testing methods of polarizers to ensure effective use in experiments.
  • Explore advanced laser options for improved coherence and quality in quantum experiments.
  • Study the theoretical foundations of the Quantum Eraser experiment to clarify its operational mechanics.
  • Investigate common pitfalls in DIY physics experiments and how to troubleshoot them effectively.
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, educators, and students interested in experimental quantum mechanics, particularly those conducting DIY experiments related to wave-particle duality and polarization effects.

jimjones
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am trying to perform the DIY quantum eraser experiment, but I'm having some trouble. When I perform the classic double slit experiment using a cheap laser pointer and a piece of wire I get a beautiful interference pattern as expected. However when I try the DIY QE experiment I still get an interference pattern, but slightly smudged. I'm using cheap cardboard 3D glasses for the polarizers. I lined up perpendicular pieces and cut them straight. I butted them up against each other and covered the joint with a piece of wire. I've double checked the alignment of the polarizers several times, but I'm still getting the interference pattern. Could my laser pointer be too low quality? Are the polarizing lenses ineffective? Or do I misunderstand the experiment? Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm unfamiliar with the DIY QE experiment. Can you provide a link.
 
ok I found it.

two questions

1) did you test the polarizers (by putting them on top of each other) to ensure that all light is being blocked by their combination?
2) did you make sure you then took them and placed them side by side without changing their orientation (including flipping front and back)? The front and back side of some polarizers are different.
 
here it is for other people
http://www.scientificamerican.com/slideshow.cfm?id=a-do-it-yourself-quantum-eraser

I don't think this actually is a real quantum eraser experiment at all. The results do not rely on knowledge of paths destroying the self interference. Knowledge of the paths wouldn't remove interference in this case because there are multiple photons so we don't just need to worry about self interference. This experiment claims that the polarization marks the streams, however it doesn't just mark the particles it also polarizes them. The polarization alone completely explains the results.
 
Yes, I've double checked the orientation of the polarizers many times, they are perpendicular.

Joseph14 said:
ok I found it.

two questions

1) did you test the polarizers (by putting them on top of each other) to ensure that all light is being blocked by their combination?
2) did you make sure you then took them and placed them side by side without changing their orientation (including flipping front and back)? The front and back side of some polarizers are different.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K