Trouble with Orthogonality in Quantum Mechanics Algebra?

sxc656
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Quantum Mechanics algebra - time independent peturbation theory

Hi

Homework Statement


The potential shown is operating on the eigenstate as shown in the pic. I am having trouble getting the second term using orthogonality (got the first term :-) ). Please Help!


Homework Equations


see pic


The Attempt at a Solution


put the i's equal to j (i.e. orthogonality) but don't know what to do next.

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • algebra.JPG
    algebra.JPG
    5.6 KB · Views: 439
Last edited:
on Phys.org
Just note that, in the sum, the only nonzero term in the second part will be the one where
i + 1 = j, so i will be equal to...
 
JSuarez said:
Just note that, in the sum, the only nonzero term in the second part will be the one where
i + 1 = j, so i will be equal to...

This was part of a hint for a question on time independent pertubation theory (see pic). i was reluctant to post the whole question because i wanted a good crack at it without help but i am now stuck. i can't seem to get the 2nd order term and can't work out what happens with the first order term.

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • algebra2.JPG
    algebra2.JPG
    23.4 KB · Views: 464
Last edited:
Well, you're given a formula for the energy [itex]E_0[/itex] in terms of [itex]\hat{V}[/itex], and you're given a formula for [itex]\hat{V}[/itex]. What happens when you plug [itex]\hat{V}[/itex] into the energy formula? If you get stuck, show your work.
 
Thanks for the replies. This is my working so far (see attachment). I have plugged V in but am stuck on the last 2 lines of my working. Using orthogonality i think you get lambda and lambda* for the 1st terms of the second-last and last-lines respectively but what about the second terms in those lines?
Thanks
 

Attachments

  • algebra3.JPG
    algebra3.JPG
    24.3 KB · Views: 475
sxc656 said:
Thanks for the replies. This is my working so far (see attachment). I have plugged V in but am stuck on the last 2 lines of my working. Using orthogonality i think you get lambda and lambda* for the 1st terms of the second-last and last-lines respectively but what about the second terms in those lines?
Thanks

Ah, do they equal zero (the last terms) because i is from 0 to infinity and those two terms require i=-1?
 
Yeah, you can use that argument for the second term on each of the last two lines.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K