What Are Quantum Numbers and Spin in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chmate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Terms
chmate
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hi there! My physics teacher explained us a Ratherford model of atom and used some terms like "spin" and "quantic number". I'm havin trouble with these terms and maybe anybody can explain me the function of "quantic number" and spinnig and give me a basic example.

I just visited some web sites searching for help, but they have more new terms and i can't understand.

Thank you and sorry for my english.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Spin is magnet in atom - not 2. This no good when polarised.
 
Last edited:
Hi QuantumBend! I don't understand you. You didn't give a good explanation. Can somebody help me to understand these two terms and give me some basic example?

Thank you.
 
Maybe you can show us the website and say what terms you have trouble with.

'quantic number', maybe you mean "quantum magnetic number"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics )
(the first sections)

and this one:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/spin.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top