Troubleshooting Newton-Raphson Iteration for Log-Likelihood Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kinetica
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Kinetica
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi guys!
I have solved a log-likelihood problem and its Newton-Raphson Iteration. My step-by-step solution is attached.

The only problem I have is when I plug in numbers, the final number for the first order Newton-Raphson is different from my professor's.

I guess you don't need any numbers. If you can can detect a mistake in my formula derivation, I will really appreciate it.
 

Attachments

  • Newton-Raphson.png
    Newton-Raphson.png
    7.9 KB · Views: 463
on Phys.org
Yep! It's different.
I am taking derivative with respect to that t-look-alike.
So I guess you treat x as a number.
But I cannot guarantee it.
Correct me if I am wrong please.

vela said:
Just to clarify, the t index variable of the summations is distinct from [itex]\tau[/itex], right? What depends on t? What happened to the term

[tex]\sum_{t=1}^n \log x![/tex]

?