Troubleshooting Overhead Crane Gearbox Issues

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on troubleshooting gearbox issues in an overhead crane with a total weight of 44,250 lbs and a 4-ton capacity. The gearbox, driven by a 2HP electric motor at 1750 RPM, has a 30:1 gear ratio, resulting in an output speed of 233 RPM and a torque of 2,232 in-lbs. Calculations confirm that the current gearbox can handle the load, as the required torque to move the crane is calculated to be 540 in-lbs. Participants validate the math and clarify the relationship between horsepower, torque, and RPM in the context of the crane's operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gearbox ratios and torque calculations
  • Familiarity with horsepower and its relationship to torque and RPM
  • Knowledge of electric motor specifications and performance
  • Basic principles of mechanical engineering related to load calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "gearbox torque calculations" for practical applications
  • Study "electric motor performance metrics" to optimize crane operations
  • Explore "overhead crane safety standards" to ensure compliance
  • Investigate "gearbox maintenance best practices" to prolong equipment life
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, crane operators, maintenance technicians, and anyone involved in the design or operation of overhead cranes will benefit from this discussion.

SevenToFive
Messages
56
Reaction score
3
I have an overhead crane and we are having some issues with the gearboxes that drive the bridge. The total crane weight is 44250lbs and has a 4 ton capacity. The wheels are 13.5 inches in diameter and have a wheel load of 16500lbs. The gearbox is driven by a 2HP electric motor at 1750rpm. The gearbox itself is 30:1, the output speed is 233rpm and 2232in-lbs of torque.
I added the weight of the crane and capacity to give me 52250lbs, and divide it by 4 for each of the wheels of the end truck I get 13062.5lbs.
Using HP = n*T/5252 I can solve for T which should be the torque required to move the crane correct? I then have 5252*2HP/233rpm=T. This gives me a value of T=45.0015ft-lbs which is 540 in-lbs of torque. So our current gearbox has plenty of torque.

Am I on the right path? I haven't done this in awhile.

Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Shouldn't the RPM's on the gearbox be part of the 30:1 ratio? Is this a homework problem or a real world problem? If it's a homework problem, I would guess, based on the values given, that other things are being asked for in the problem. In any case, power throughout the system in theory, is going to be constant. So, your math is right if that's all you were solving for, power = torque*rotation speed, as long as the 5252 converts it correctly, I think that's right. It put in into more convenient units, HP * 1100 ft lb/s, and 60 RPM = 1 RPS (obviously). Actually, that gives me a different answer unless I did something wrong with my math or units. T = P/omega = 2200 ft lb/s / [233 RPM/(60 RPM/RPS)]

It's been a long time since I had to use this kind of stuff too, but I think that's correct. I'm still not sure where the 5252 came from though.

Anyway, hope that helps.
 
SevenToFive said:
Using HP = n*T/5252 I can solve for T which should be the torque required to move the crane correct? I then have 5252*2HP/233rpm=T. This gives me a value of T=45.0015ft-lbs which is 540 in-lbs of torque.

The math is good and the equation is used correctly with the proper units.

SevenToFive said:
The gearbox is driven by a 2HP electric motor at 1750rpm. The gearbox itself is 30:1, the output speed is 233rpm and 2232in-lbs of torque.
How did you get 233 rpm and 2232 in.lb? This makes 8 hp per the formula above.

The electric motor torque is 6 ft.lb (= 2*5252/1750) or 72 in.lb.
The gearbox rpm and torque are 58.3 rpm (= 1750/30) and 2160 in.lb (= 72*30) or 180 ft.lb. This still makes 2 hp (= 58.3*180/5252), as it should.
 
jlefevre76, this is a project from work that sort of got dumped on me.

Jack Action, I got the 233rpm and 2232in.lb from the gearbox manufacturers catalog.

I think I figured it out and the current gearboxes are large enough to handle the load.

Thanks for looking into this and appreciate the review.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K