Troublesome coefficient of variation question.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter th_05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient Variation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of variation (c.v.) for three investments (A, B, and C) based on their expected profits and standard deviations. Participants explore how to interpret the c.v. in terms of risk assessment and consider the use of diagrams to illustrate their findings.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes calculating the c.v. by dividing the standard deviation by the mean for each investment.
  • Another participant questions whether the underlying distributions of the investments are assumed to be normal and suggests drawing bell curves for visualization.
  • There is a discussion on the interpretation of the c.v. as a measure of relative variability, with one participant explaining that a larger c.v. indicates more variability around the mean.
  • A suggestion is made to compare two normal distributions with the same mean but different standard deviations to illustrate the concept of c.v. visually.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the c.v. and whether to assume normal distributions for the investments. There is no consensus on the best approach to visualize the data or definitively determine which investment is the least risky based on the c.v.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the assumptions regarding the normality of the distributions or the appropriate methods for visual representation of the data. The discussion includes varying interpretations of the c.v. and its implications for risk assessment.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in investment analysis, statistical measures of risk, and the application of the coefficient of variation in financial contexts.

th_05
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Given the following data for three possibile investments, A, B and C, calculate the coefficient of variation and with the aid of a diagram explain which is the least risky investment.

Expected Profit: A - 100 B - 120 C - 140
Standard Devi.: A - 10 B - 30 C - 20

I presume to calculate the COV you divide the standard deviation by the mean, to give you:

A: 100/10 = 0.1 B: 30/120 = 0.25 C: 20/140 = 0.14

I am struggling with how/what sort of diagram to use and how to explain which is the least risky investment. Any ideas would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you to assume that the underlying distributions are normal for each investment? If so, you have the mean and standard deviation for each investment; draw the bell curves.

For evaluating which is riskiest: the use of the coefficient of variation is pretty informal: begin by stating, in your own words, what the c.v. tells you (I don't mean in terms of what percentage of the mean the standard deviation is, I mean the interpretation). You may find yourself answering the question when you do that.
 
statdad said:
Are you to assume that the underlying distributions are normal for each investment? If so, you have the mean and standard deviation for each investment; draw the bell curves.

For evaluating which is riskiest: the use of the coefficient of variation is pretty informal: begin by stating, in your own words, what the c.v. tells you (I don't mean in terms of what percentage of the mean the standard deviation is, I mean the interpretation). You may find yourself answering the question when you do that.

Thanks very much. It is normal distribution yes, I have not used c.v. before so what exactly does this tell me? And shall I draw out a curve for each investment?
 
The c.v. gives the size of the standard deviation relative to the mean. For a problem in which c.v. - 12.5%, the standard deviation is 12.5% as large as the mean. (we usually report the c.v. as a percentage). It is a measure of "relative variability" - meaning it is one way to compare the variability of different groups. Loosely speaking, the larger the c.v., the more variable (spread out) the data values are around the mean.

Try this: consider two normal distributions, one with mean 100 and sigma = 20, the other with mean 100 and sigma = 35. Draw each of them, as accurately as possible, and note which curve is "fatter". Now compare the c.v.s for each: the fatter curve has the larger c.v.

That little example is easily visualized because the two means are equal, but the same concept will apply in your problem: the larger the c.v., the more variable the values around the mean.

For your second question, yes, draw the appropriate bell curve for each group - again, as accurately as possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K