True or false problem for double differentiable function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the true or false problem regarding the implications of a double differentiable function, specifically focusing on the relationship between the second derivative and the first derivative. The participants analyze the claim that if \( f''(x) > 0 \), then \( f'(x) > 0 \) for \( x < a \). They provide counterexamples, such as \( f(x) = x(x - 1) \), demonstrating that a positive second derivative does not guarantee a positive first derivative in all cases. The consensus indicates that the original assertion is flawed due to the misapplication of inequalities when rearranging terms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts, specifically derivatives and their implications.
  • Familiarity with the properties of convex functions and their graphical interpretations.
  • Knowledge of limit definitions and their application in calculus.
  • Ability to analyze and construct mathematical proofs involving inequalities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Mean Value Theorem in relation to derivatives.
  • Explore the properties of convex functions and their first and second derivatives.
  • Learn about the application of inequalities in calculus, particularly in proofs involving derivatives.
  • Investigate counterexamples in calculus to understand the limitations of derivative implications.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in advanced calculus concepts, particularly those studying the behavior of differentiable functions and their derivatives.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this true or false problem,
1715582269576.png

My solution is,
With rearrangement ##\frac{f(x) - f(a)}{x - a} > f'(a)## for ##x < a## since ##f''(x) > 0## implies ##f'(x)) > 0## from integration. ##f'(x) > 0## is equivalent to ##f(x)## is strictly increase which means that ##\frac{f(x) - f(a)}{x - a} > f'(a) = \lim_{x \to a} \frac{f(x) - f(a)}{x - a}##. However, I feel like I'm not showing enough steps in the proof to show for sure that the answer is True.

Does anybody else agree and know what more I should include?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ChiralSuperfields said:
since ##f''(x) > 0## implies ##f'(x)) > 0## from integration
Counter example:
$$
f(x) = x(x - 1)
$$
This leads to ##f''(x)= 2 > 0## and ##f'(x) = 2x - 1##, which is negative for ##x < 1/2##.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and FactChecker
Second derivative positive implies ##f## is convex for ##x<a##. Take anything that is convex and decreasing for (some) ##x<a## as counterexample to your claim of ##f'(x)>0##.

As for the initial claim, think again of convexity. The slope at ##x=a## must be as large as it gets as ##x\to a-##. Moving to the left necessarily decreases the slope.

To illustrate, let ##f(x)=x^2## and ##a=1##. The slope at ##a=1## is ##2##, whereas if ##x=1-\delta##, then
<br /> \frac{1-(1-\delta)^2}{\delta} = 2-\delta&lt;2.<br />

Apply this concept in the general case.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Orodruin said:
Counter example:
$$
f(x) = x(x - 1)
$$
This leads to ##f''(x)= 2 > 0## and ##f'(x) = 2x - 1##, which is negative for ##x < 1/2##.
I don't think that is a counter example. ##f'(x)(x-1/2)## is positive, so ##f(x) > f(1/2) + f'(1/2)(x-1/2) = -1/4## for ##x < 1/2##
temp.png
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
FactChecker said:
I don't think that is a counter example. ##f'(x)(x-1/2)## is positive, so ##f(x) > f(1/2) + f'(1/2)(x-1/2) = -1/4## for ##x < 1/2##
View attachment 345170

It i a counter example to the assertion f&#039;&#039;(x) &gt; 0 \Rightarrow f(x) &gt; 0.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016, FactChecker and SammyS
the thing that puzzled me is that the original statement was true in all my examples (since the hypothesis implies the left part of the curve lies above its tangent line,) but the rearranged one was not. Then I finally noticed you had divided your inequality by the negative number (x-a), which should have changed its direction.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
FactChecker said:
I don't think that is a counter example. ##f'(x)(x-1/2)## is positive, so ##f(x) > f(1/2) + f'(1/2)(x-1/2) = -1/4## for ##x < 1/2##
View attachment 345170
Not to the problem statement, to the OP’s assertion that I quoted.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016 and FactChecker
Orodruin said:
Not to the problem statement, to the OP’s assertion that I quoted.

Sorry. I missed that point. I stand corrected.
 
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: member 731016

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K