True or false question regarding the convergence of a series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the series ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n##, particularly analyzing the condition ##\lim_{n \to \infty} na_n = 2##. Participants clarify that this implies ##na_n## diverges, leading to the conclusion that the series diverges as well. The limit comparison test is highlighted as a valid method to prove divergence, with the series ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n}## serving as a reference for comparison. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding convergence definitions and applying them correctly in analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits and convergence in sequences
  • Familiarity with the limit comparison test in series
  • Knowledge of epsilon-delta definitions of limits
  • Basic concepts of series divergence and convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the limit comparison test in detail
  • Learn about the epsilon-delta definition of convergence
  • Explore examples of series that diverge and converge
  • Investigate the implications of ##\lim_{n \to \infty} na_n = c## for different constants c
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, series convergence, and divergence tests. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of series behavior in calculus.

songoku
Messages
2,509
Reaction score
393
Homework Statement
If ##\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} (n . a_n) = 2## , then ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n## diverges.

True of false?
Relevant Equations
not sure
I think ##\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} a_n = 0## since by direct substitution the value of limit won't be equal to 2 so by direct substitution we must get indeterminate form.

Then how to check for ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n##? I don't think divergence test, integral test, comparison test, limit comparison test, ratio test and root test can be used.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does it mean, that ##\lim_{n \to \infty} na_n=2\,?## Derive a condition on ##a_n## from that and think of what it means for the series.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku and member 587159
To complement the excellent hint of @fresh_42, recall that ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty 1/n## diverges. One of the test you mentioned can in fact be used.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
fresh_42 said:
What does it mean, that ##\lim_{n \to \infty} na_n=2\,?## Derive a condition on ##a_n## from that and think of what it means for the series.

Math_QED said:
To complement the excellent hint of @fresh_42, recall that ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty 1/n## diverges. One of the test you mentioned can in fact be used.
I am not sure I get the hint.

##\lim_{n \to \infty} na_n=2## means that n . an diverges

Is this what you mean? What other information can be obtained besides ##\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n=0\,?##

Or maybe an can only be in form of rational function where the power of denominator is one higher than numerator and the coefficient of highest power in numerator is 2 so when multiplied by n the limit is 2 and by using limit comparison test with 1/n the result is the series always diverges?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
##\lim_{n \to \infty} na_n=2## means that n . an diverges

Is this what you mean? What other information can be obtained besides ##\lim_{n \to \infty} a_n=0\,?##
No, this wasn't what I meant. It is a simple statement ##A \Longrightarrow B##. So all we have is that ##na_n## converges at two. But convergence has a precise meaning which we can write down. It is all we have. You will not solve the problem by talking. What does ##\lim_{n\to \infty} b_n=b## mean in formulas? This will result ín a condition for ##b_n##, especially a lower bound.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Sorry still not getting your hint
fresh_42 said:
No, this wasn't what I meant. It is a simple statement ##A \Longrightarrow B##. So all we have is that ##na_n## converges at two. But convergence has a precise meaning which we can write down. It is all we have. You will not solve the problem by talking.

Meaning of convergence:
If the sequence of partial sums Sn has a limit L, the infinite series converges to that
limit, and we write
\sum_{k=1}^\infty a_k = \lim_n \rightarrow \infty \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k = \lim_n \rightarrow \infty S_n = L

If the sequence of partial sums diverges, the infinite series also diverges.

Is that the one?

What does ##\lim_{n\to \infty} b_n=b## mean in formulas? This will result ín a condition for ##b_n##, especially a lower bound.
I do not know what it means in formulas. Do you mean the definition of limit related to epsilon - delta?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Sorry still not getting your hintMeaning of convergence:
If the sequence of partial sums Sn has a limit L, the infinite series converges to that
limit, and we write
\sum_{k=1}^\infty a_k = \lim_n \rightarrow \infty \sum_{k=1}^{n} a_k = \lim_n \rightarrow \infty S_n = L

If the sequence of partial sums diverges, the infinite series also diverges.

Is that the one?I do not know what it means in formulas. Do you mean the definition of limit related to epsilon - delta?

Thanks

Yes, use the epsilon-delta (well rather epsilon-N) definition of convergence with a suitable epsilon.

What does ##\lim_n na_n=2## mean in epsilon-delta language?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
Math_QED said:
Yes, use the epsilon-delta (well rather epsilon-N) definition of convergence with a suitable epsilon.

What does ##\lim_n na_n=2## mean in epsilon-delta language?

Let me try:

For every ε > 0, there is corresponding number N such that if x > N then |n . an - 2| < ε

## - \varepsilon < n . a_n - 2 < \varepsilon ##

## 2 - \varepsilon < n . a_n < 2 + \varepsilon ##

##\frac{2 - \varepsilon}{n} < a_n < \frac{2 + \varepsilon}{n}##

##\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2 - \varepsilon}{n} < \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n < \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{2 + \varepsilon}{n}##

By comparison test, since the left sum is diverge, then the middle sum also diverges.

Is this correct?
 
The idea is certainly correct now, but the exposition needs some work. Don't worry, this is usual when learning real analysis.

The "for every ##\epsilon > 0##" part is a bit weird. Just pick one particular epsilon, for example ##\epsilon = 1##. Then for ##n## sufficiently large, say ##n \geq n_0##, we have

##-1 < n a_n - 2 < 1 \implies 1 < n a_n##

In particular, for ##n \geq n_0##

##a_n > 1/n##.

Your inequalities with the series are not entirely correct. We only have this inequality for sufficiently large index values n! So, we should do:

##\sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n = \sum_{n=1}^{n_0-1} a_n + \sum_{n=n_0}^\infty a_n \geq \sum_{n=1}^{n_0-1} a_n + \sum_{n=n_0}^\infty 1/n##

and the right side diverges (if ##\sum_{n=n_0}^\infty 1/n## would converge, then also ##\sum_{n=1}^\infty 1/n##), so we are done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #10
songoku said:
limit comparison test

Think about how you might apply that test.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #11
Dick said:
Think about how you might apply that test.
I do not have any ideas. Where should I start?

Thanks
 
  • #12
songoku said:
I do not have any ideas. Where should I start?

Thanks

Start by stating what the test says. It might get you started.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #13
Dick said:
Start by stating what the test says. It might get you started.

Suppose ##\sum p_n and \sum q_n ## with pn and qn both > 0 for all n. If ##\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{p_n}{q_n} = L## where L > 0 and finite then either both series converge or both diverge.

I want to check an so let assume an = pn and I need to find suitable qn so the limit is L.

I do not know what the suitable qn is.

Thanks
 
  • #14
songoku said:
Suppose ##\sum p_n and \sum q_n ## with pn and qn both > 0 for all n. If ##\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{p_n}{q_n} = L## where L > 0 and finite then either both series converge or both diverge.

I want to check an so let assume an = pn and I need to find suitable qn so the limit is L.

I do not know what the suitable qn is.

Thanks

How about ##q_n=\frac{1}{n}##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: songoku
  • #15
Dick said:
How about ##q_n=\frac{1}{n}##?
oh my god. I wrote pn = an but what I tried so far was always using pn = n. an, that's why I always got stucked. Got it

Thank you very much for all the help fresh_42, math_qed and dick
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 587159

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K